• Well put, and I hope to see your documentary. I hate the idea of vaccinations and believe they can be harmful individually but we are part of a community and as such, we have responsibilities to each other, so my son'a vaccinations are up to date. The reality is that no one knows what will happen to us or our children, whether we are talking about injury by vaccine, or injury by preventable disease, or running in a marathon where a terrorist is in wait, or getting in a car and being wiped out by a drunk driver. We all do what we can for our kids and we can try and protect them as much as we can - but none of us escape misfortune. I have a friend whose son has shocking tumours and a limited life span. My own son has a platelet disorder which means we have to be constantly vigilant that he doesn't injure himself lest he bleed internally. Let's do what we can for our own - but let's not harm others in the process. - Alice Smith
  • What a fabulously challenging topic. Jackdan, very well delivered argument. I'd love to see your research. Publish it! Sonya, I look forward to tomorrow night's documentary. Thanks for taking (what sounds like) a rational approach. - Misty
  • Thanks jack... a very interesting response and, from my communications with Sonya I think this is exactly the conversation she's hoping for. Be very interested to hear your response after viewing the doco. - Wendy Harmer
  • As someone who doesn't follow the Australian Vaccination schedule, I already feel like I am risking ridicule and worse posting here. We have been hassled and hounded by doctors, nurses (one of us is a nurse) and other parents. Blamed for the resurgence Whooping cough and related deaths, etc. Our stance is that we immunise based on our own needs and intelligence. As a for instance, we are not convinced that our children needed to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B at birth, especially given that the vaccine contained Thiomersal when it was recommended to us. I'm not sure how aware you are of the Japanese experience with the DTP vaccinations in the mid 1970's, but as a result of many adverse reactions and over 30 deaths as a direct result of the vaccine, the schedule was altered and children were vaccinated later. I am aware that the vaccine is no longer a whole cell vaccine, however it is worth considering the delicate balance of the immune system in infants below 6 months of age. So we immunise roughly to the Japanese schedule. There is no Hep B or vericella. And MMR is given as MR and Mumps separately. We will make the call on Japanese when we visit next month. I note that the tone in the promotion of the doco appears to depict the non vaccination school as driven by emotion with the pro vaccination argument being driven by Science (which is a pretty broad concept). Our decision to vaccinate alternatively has been based on a lot of careful research and is based on risk mitigation considering that vaccinations do carry a percentage of risk, however small. We have the advantage of also being Japanese citizens, (myself a spouse resident) and can access the differently combined vaccines and scheduling. When recently discussing this on a facebook post I was branded an anti Vaccinator. Abused and blamed. My response is that I think there is a better way. A much better way. And the heavy handed pressure to Immunise to schedule, which then elicits a strong anti response from those who question, but are discouraged strongly and frowned upon for questioning, has created a climate of 'for or against', emotion or science, us against them. All pretty narrow reductive way to explore a whole collection of different diseases, risks, and vaccines (including their varieties of compositions, combinations and timing). So we have attempted to immunise the best way that we can ascertain. It's a tricky time consuming task to get all the info on each different vaccine from the manufacturers, to research each and every disease to ascertain the risks of actually contracting it and then what the risks associated with the disease are, but it has been worthwhile. I think that the community could benefit from a less doctrinal approach to the current immunisation schedule and regular review of disease risks and the vaccination schedule response. - Jackdan
  • I'm an E cup. When I was younger and skinnier I was only a C cup and could handle underwires. Then I got pregnant and discovered the bliss of maternity bras. Post babies and breastfeeding I went back to the wires only to find they poked me and now I've got 'birdseyes' in my cleavage. I cannot fathom the underwire. Obviously the person who designed it has never had to wear one. Having big boobs we're all encouraged to wear them, but now I'm old and fat they're far too uncomfortable to contemplate. I'm happy with my 'wirefree' bras. I figured that if manufacturers could make a maternity bra without wires that fitted perfectly and provided excellent support to lactating breasts, they could do the same for large, non-lactating breasts too. I found the perfect fit for me at a large chain store and bought the same type for years. Not terribly sexy, but comfortable and serviceable. Now I've discovered same large chain has a moulded cotton bra in large sizes. Better still, you can order them online when the sales are on and collect them from the store. Bliss! - BeansGran
  • Well put Sonya. I am so glad that you have created this documentary. Also, you have put forward a voice of reason backed up by compelling evidence & your own credibility. I am pro-vaccination, but I understand why it is an delicate decision for many parents. I haven't come across the anti-vax theories (I'd never even heard of the AVN until Mamamia kept writing & tweeting about them). I'd always just followed the immunisation schedule. But I have come across a lot of pushy pro-vaxxers and I have to say, it is a turn off. I understand that it's a passionate issue. But is it an effective way of increasing immunisation rates? Of course not. Some pro-vaxxers make it their full time job to name, shame & harass people opposed to vaccination. Is harassment going to change their position, heck no! Is it going to galvanise their anti-vac position, quite probably! I just think we need to be smarter about this. I know it is not a "debate" in the sense that the science is in on the benefits & general safety of vaccines. But it completely normal to feel uneasy about purposely injecting your child with something most of us know very little about. And then watching their every breath that evening as they process that vaccine. Sonya, I hope that your documentary is the beginning of the change in the way we talk about immunisation. Well done. - Kasey
  • I am very impressed by what you've set out to achieve and how you've come about it. Much of my work these days is in vaccination and I work hard to break down the myths and false beliefs people have about vaccines. I find listening to concerns, empathy and responding with good evidence based information has been the most successful manner I've had so far. I also reassure parents that it is always their choice, but I also share that I am a mum too and that I choose to vaccinate my child fully. And funnily enough that's usually the clincher. Respect, good information and empathy can go a long way. I really hope that many people watch your documentary and help absolve the many concerns and myths surrounding vaccination that are out there. You must be proud of your work :) - The Huntress
  • Not everyone has access too or any interest in the internet, you cannot drive a tractor and watch the internet but you can listen to radio, you cannot drive a car and watch the internet but you can listen to radio, you cannot wash the dishes, the clothes, yourself and watch the internet but you can listen to the radio, you can also lie in bed with Phillip Adams, half my University of the Third Age students go to bed with Phillip. Australia's best journalists were trained by the ABC. What I don't understand Gee is your palpable hatred, how can you be so angry all the time, just relax and learn that we are all different and some of us prefer the quiet nature of the ABC compared with the ranting and rage of radio shock jocks and commercial TV. Your phrase 'slash and burn' is shocking to me, no one I know hates anything, no one I know wants to destroy things or institutions, not even the IPA, why such violence of language? - sue Bell
  • [...] Science says vaccinate! [...] - LET'S TALK (NOT SHOUT) VACCINATION
  • Thankyou Emma for your good work and humanistic attitude towards others. I could not do your job and be nice to others at the same time, i'v e realized. The other ABC journo's et al should be taking notes.......all the best in your career! - louise
 
Categories:  News and Opinion

TRAGEDY, THEN THE ‘DEATH KNOCK’

I’m a coward. I didn’t have the courage to go to a friend’s funeral this past week.


After another tragic death, is this a line the media shouldn’t cross?

Initially I tried to convince myself that I couldn’t organise a babysitter to look after my small girls. What nonsense… Yes, I had a sitter but I wimped out of confronting the raw, exposed grief of a family who had lost their dad, husband, son and mate.

He was a handsome, charismatic man who had blazed through high school, shone on the beach and later in the boardrooms.

A terrible illness has robbed him of his looks, his strength and then his will to live.

What do you say to his family at a funeral? Somehow, “I’m so sorry”, doesn’t seem to cut it. How can words ever, ever be enough to compensate or adequately describe the measureless pain that you feel when someone you adore has died?

My wimpy behaviour reminds me of a sentiment from a counsellor friend of mine, ‘that we don’t do dying well’. She’s spot on.

This woman has worked with families whose children have terminal cancer. She is the bravest person I know. How does she do it? Well, she says, it’s about different doses of care, compassion and humour. This woman says she has the best job in the world as she is able to share the most intimate and honest time in a family’s life.

But there are some things that you don’t need to share – and this is coming from someone who is very comfortable ‘sharing’ moments of Dr Phil proportions.

And what isn’t necessary is intruding on the grief of a parent who has lost a child and then plastering it across our media.

I’m a hypocrite as I’ve presented numerous news bulletins that have included the heartbreak of a family who have lost a child. Each time I have introduced such a story, I have watched the item, and then turned away.

My colleagues and I would say how terribly sad it was, and then we would move onto the next story.  Something a family can never, ever do.

However, since becoming a mum, it’s harder to move onto the next story. I have no idea how those parents feel. I don’t allow my imagination to go there, as  I’m terrified by the torrent of emotions such a catastrophe would unleash within me. That’s why I wish we could leave those parents to grieve in private.

One of the worst jobs of being a reporter on the road was being told to do a ‘death knock’.

Literally it means to knock on the door of a family who has just lost a loved one, and to ask them “how do you feel?”. Often the shell-shocked family would be told that by talking, it might prevent the tragedy happening to another family. What?

That is misleading and not necessarily true. I think it’s amoral, as it is asking someone a question at a time when they are at their most vulnerable.  Journalists would often get the door slammed in their face – as they should.

But occasionally, the screen door would be opened and the camera crews would be asked in to a place where no stranger should tread. And it was frequently families who were unfamiliar with the ways of the media who would open their door.

These were the very same families who should have been protected and shielded in their very darkest hour.

 Page 1 of 2 next >>
support us

38 Responses to this article

  1. Dramaqueen75 October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica, you have hit the nail on the head. We don’t watch any TV news coverage in our house. We made that choice when the kids were young as the news broadcasts are sensationalised and frightening. I can’t bear the media beat ups and the transformation of people’s tragedies and misfortunes into grotesque entertainment. I am also aware of the bias in the media- look at the “cash for comment” or pressure from vested interest media owners in the current poker machine regulations debate.

    I get my information from the paper, ABC radio and research etc. I avoid the hype, the exploitation and negativity of commercial news broadcasts.

    Nice to know you had enough scruples to not interview people in their worst moments of grief and pain.

     
  2. Kylie Johnson October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica and I went to uni together and we learned so much about media…but I don’t think anything can prepare you from the pressure your boss puts on you to ‘get the family’ after a tragedy. I can still do impressions of one of the producers on a current affairs show I worked on: ‘Maaaate, it’s a tribute to your dead daughter/son/wife/mother/dog’. He was a great success at convincing the family to speak and was lauded as a hero in the office. The very fabulous and moral Leigh Hatcher (now at Sky News) told me about the grass knock, and I’ve always respected him for his stance and certainly tried his approach. However, the wrath of the boss was always a terrifying and blunt instrument if another channel got the ‘exclusive’….

     
  3. Celia October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jess, you have dredged up the ghosts of deathknocks passed. At least young reporters can access the all-important photos from Facebook now.
    Will we ever forget our former colleague camping outside the house of David Wilson, kidnapped and murdered in Cambodia….”Mrs Wilson, if you loved your son you’d come out and talk to us” ……..don’t get me started!

     
  4. Jo Wiffrie October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    If the past couple of weeks has shown us anything, it is that the idea of grieving parents airing their story, as a warning to others, doesn’t work.
    Well done Jessica, for standing up for your moral values, not many do these days.
    I remember (twenty years ago) before being allowed to write news for radio, I had to study the regulation on broadcast journalism, since then, either the rules have changed or nobody cares about fair representation anymore.
    The sensationalist current affairs shows wonder why their ratings are slipping, most people are bored with the sensationalist format and especially dislike the deceptive snippet advertising these shows use to lure you into watching.
    There is nothing sensational about the loss of a child or any loved one for that matter. People should be allowed to grieve in peace, I for one, don’t have to see the parents of that child to know they are completely devastated.
    I wish more journo’s did the grass knock.

     
  5. Lavender1947 October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I am with you on this one Jessica. I have two girls and 5 grandkids and it gets harder each day to even read the heartbreak let alone hear it. So much each week about families loosing their loved ones. My sponge is full, can’t take any more of it. I read Google news when I want to, that way I can pick and choose how much I let my heart get torn apart.

     
  6. Valerie Parv October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica, most have commented on the reporting aspect but I’d like to add 2c worth about attending a funeral. I used to be like you, staying away on any pretext because I “didn’t like funerals”. Who does? Then my husband of 38 years passed away and I needed every one of the people who came to his funeral. They made me feel less alone, less as if the world had ended. I promised myself then that I would make the effort next time because it matters.

     
    • Wendy Harmer October 4, 2011 Reply
       
       

      I agree with you, Valerie. My husband is a very regular attendee at funerals and with many friends in their fifties, he finds himself off to many for their parents. He never complains about having to go, in fact feels it a sacred duty that he’s glad to perform. Through him I have learned that funerals are for the living. It is important to loved ones that funerals and wakes are well attended. He is renowned as being always the last one to leave the wake. I love him for that. He is made of stern and compassionate stuff. I think we always regret it when we don’t go, as Jess has bravely written.

       
      • dramaqueen75 October 4, 2011 Reply
         
         

        I agree whole-heatedly, we go to support the living but also to honour the passing of a life.

        The one thing none of us can avoid is death, it’s the only certainty in our lives. If we understand that we can take pleasure in every moment of even the most banal days with the knowledge that nothing lasts forever.

        I love it when we remember those who have gone before us, see their photos, hear the tales of their lives. Their stories deserve to be heard and their lives celebrated.

         
    • Margaret Colley October 4, 2011 Reply
       
       

      I also agree with Valerie, and am reminded of the time when my mother was dying in hospital, and my brother wouldn’t go to visit her because he found it ‘too distressing’. My mother was heartbroken. Nobody enjoys attending the funeral or death bed of a loved one, but we do it because it’s the right thing to do, and we’re adults who accept life sucks sometimes. I would have great difficulty in forgiving a close friend who wasn’t there to pat my hand at the funeral of any of my loved ones. I hope, for her sake, that Jessica’s friends are more accepting.

       
  7. Donna @ NappyDaze October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    What an amazing insight here. I too shudder watching some stories and wonder how on earth these poor people have been convinced to talk to cameras during such a harrowing time. I was so very close to studying TV journalism – I shudder to think how I would have coped at such confronting times. Well done to you Jessica for such a brilliant job at exposing this ugly side.

     
  8. wilmawalrus October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Thank you Jessica – this issue about intrusive media at distressing times in people’s lives is something that infuriates me every time I see a news bulletin. I work in commercial news as an autocue operator, and as a mother of two and a member of a family, the unneccessary vision of people being wheeled into hospitals on gurneys, bodies under blankets after shootings or road accidents, and the doorstopping of grieving families can be overwhelming. It is comforting to hear that there are some journalists out there who stand up to their employers by not shooting or showing such footage. If only more news producers would develop the same compassion!

     
  9. Wendy Harmer October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jess, my one and only “death knock” as a young journo at the Geelong Advertiser is seared into my brain.

    A father had taken his young son on a boating trip and the child had drowned. Later that day I was sent to the man’s home to fetch a photo of the litte boy. While I was there,the man’s estranged wife (mother of the boy) arrived to confront him. (He’d had custody of the child that day)
    Well, you can imagine! I still, 25 years later remember that dreadful scene. I grabbed the photo and fled and was so upset I wasn’t ever sent on those stories again!
    Didn’t last long at police rounds either – chose urban affairs instead.

     
  10. Lesley Palma October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I agree with Valerie. At both funerals of Mum and Dad I was overwhelmed by the attendance of people who I did not expect to be there and it did give me the comfort I needed to get through each of those days. You were probably thinking that your friend would have enough people around at the funeral for comfort but your friend needed you as well Jessica, believe me.

     
    • Ann-Maree from Taree October 4, 2011 Reply
       
       

      I’m also in agreement with Valerie …as a child educated at a catholic school that was located behind the church we often formed guards of honour and attended funerals of identities in the town…..contrasted with my husband, who had never attended one until the death of a grandparent, he was in his twenties and absolutely devastated by the whole ‘funeral;’ experience.
      Although never easy to attend, you are often lifted by the experience, and more and more so, they have become a celebration of the person’s life…..so Jessica, I hope the next time one comes around you’ll find the courage to go!

       
  11. Donna Kilby October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Thank you, Jessica. A few years ago as a 21 year old journo on the South Coast, I was asked to go on a death knock to talk to the family of a girl who died in a boat crash. The girl was my age. I had no on-camera experience. I felt so pressured I at first agreed, but realised there was no way I could pull it off.

    The head of news at a major station affiliated with my small regional station called me and told me in no uncertain terms that I would never amount to anything.

    it was at that point I realised news journalism is not for me.

     
  12. MadamBipolar October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I have done many door knocks and the one thing that struck me is some families welcome them in the sense that it is recognition of how important their loved one was to them.
    I went into robot mode on death knocks. There is no way I could do it now. When I was 23, it was a different story. You have to do what you have to do and not think too much about it.
    Like Donna, I realised news journalism was not my thing.

     
  13. Maid In Australia October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I agree wholeheartedly.
    However, when I lived and worked in England … and dreaded being asked to do the deathknock … in magazines we ofted wrote letters to the bereaved families or phoned family friends or members, sharing our sympathy and asking if they ever felt ready to talk to the media that they consider talking to us.
    I was gobsmacked that often contact was welcomed, and I was taken into homes and treated warmly and with kindness. I don’t think I was ever actually refused and at times was sought out. Families did grieve, they cried with me, they used their 15 minutes of fame to pay tribute to those they had lost, to thank people who had helped them, to right wrongs, to get justice, to raise awareness. I was in my early 20s, and had mothers showing me precious photos of their dead babies, the place where their children were tortured and murdered … I grew up very quickly in those years and it did make me think that doing these stories could work for good not evil. I think the difference is that because we worked in magazines those people were our readers, and we didn’t contact them directly, we didn’t intrude, and we left it for them to contact us if they wanted to proceed. I – and my colleagues – also treated these people and their stories with the upmost respect, to the extent that you couldn’t help becoming involved. Sometimes you’d be sitting at the computer sobbing your heart out. It got to the stage where I had to stop doing ‘real lifes’ even though I’d made my name in them, because it was just too draining.
    I know now that I would never do a death knock and I would never write a story about a tragedy unless that person wanted it to be written. And even then it’s a close call, because having suffered with anxiety and depression myself, how would I know they were fully ready to make that decision?
    This is one of the reasons I’ve moved out of mainstream journalism – it’s all become too murky. I want to make sure I’m making a difference in the right way, and if I was working in the traditional media, I’m not sure I would be.

     
  14. Lauren October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Of course death knocks are horrendous and no journo I know would ever volunteer – and we all know how ‘those’ producers sitting on their arses back in the newsroom carry on when you say “they weren’t there” or “they said no”… and it sickens me to hear how some journos have conducted themselves around grieving families – they give us all a bad name. BUT…. I must say that on one of the death knocks I’ve done, the family was eager to talk. It was their time to put forward their side of the story and talk about how special their (adult) son was. I had tears in my eyes as they shared their grief… it seemed like it was helping them to talk. I barely asked any questions, I just let them speak…. when they were done, they thanked me for the chance to let the public know about their boy. Having experienced the loss of a close friend, I understood how they wanted to scream from the rooftops – sometimes in that time of raw grief, you are desperate for attention – like you need that person immortalised – so no one forgets them……

     
  15. Jo-Living Savvy October 4, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica, I read this post this morning and only now have been able to come back and leave my thoughts. I have been to the funerals of two friends in the past several months. It never entered my thoughts not to go, I knew this is where I needed to be and where I was wanted. I was not concerened with saying the right or wrong thing. I knew that the funeral was not about me or my ability to “provide comfort”, being there with an embrace was enough. Both of these funerals although very different were celebrations of the lives lived and love shared. I had the honor of being asked to speak at the funeral of my girlfriend who died and displayed a courage and sense of hope that will continue to inspire me long after she has gone. More recently at the funeral of my friend’s husband (whose sudden death shocked us all), I sat in a row alongside 4 other girlfriends and the energy of support that radiated through us and down to our friend was quite tangible and I hope helped her get through a day she never imagined being at. Jessica, when I first read your post this morning my feelings of judgement were strong for the decision you made, if I were to have a left a comment then it would have been much more concise something like “it wasn’t about you”….yet I also got a sense that you know this. With the gift of time (several hours have passed since I first read your article) I wondered how those early experiences of doing the death knock as a journalist has left a lasting stain for you and how you do death and dying? The great thing about stains is that with the right amount of attention they can fade away to nothing.

     
  16. Lady Penelope October 7, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Following increasingly intrusive images of victims of crime in recent years a group of victim support services & NSW haagencies are working on a guide for victims families on how to manage the ‘the death knock’. They are also looking at the curriculum & including it as an ethics subject in journalism courses.

     
  17. Patricia Murray October 20, 2011 Reply
     
     

    How well you put that Jessica. Often I have turned our TV off when they broadcast such bad taste “news” it is not news to see grieving relatives. I wish more people in the media had the moral backbone that you display.

     
  18. Jenny October 20, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I too hadn’t had occasion to attend a funeral until I was in my thirties, which does seem unusual, but until then I had not experienced the loss of any friends or family. The more time that passed, the more I dreaded having to experience one! Eventually the teenage son of friends died in a stupid and unnecessary road accident, only because he had unfastened his seatbelt too soon. Suddenly all my fear of funerals disappeared, and my only thought was that I absolutely had to be there and could not have forgiven myself if I wasn’t. Since that first time I have never missed a funeral if I could possibly be there (and there have been quite a few now – I am in my seventies) and have always been glad to have done so. People do need friends around them at this time, and I fervently hope that if I have to endure the funeral of one of my own family in the future that as many as possible of my own friends will be there for me. As for the question “what can I say?” be assured that you don’t have to say anything at all – be there with a hug, and if anything just listen.

     
  19. Seana Smith October 20, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Oh, good to open the door on this gloomy and distressing subject. I think this was one of the reasons I never did proper news work ever when I worked in TV, and ended up in the jolly world of children’s TV. Much less angst.

    Funerals are important, I think, and I feel it’s important to go. And to cry and laugh too. It’s so confronting when our friends die far, far too young.. and heart breaking to see the families left behind. The funerals of older people are very different. Sad, sad.

     
  20. snug October 24, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I believe that actually seeing the human emotion is different to when someone is reporting it.

    That stated, even I had the courage and respect to write a card to someone who recently lost a friend and colleague.

    It might not have been much, but at least this person was worth the effort.

    As for certain media, I believe that part way through last year, there were certain comments made by certain media outlets that were inconsistent with the full story of how a friend of my household’s died. I think that all of the media had the opportunity to read the Victoria Police report – it was available online.

     
  21. gardnerm October 24, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I do go to funerals, I have lost 3 people very dear to me in the last 20 months and all I remember about the funeral is being comforted by friends and family, some I hadn’t seen in years. A smile, a hug, heck…… even a laugh, means everything when you’re grieving.

     
  22. Crispy October 25, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica, you have chosen an intensely difficult profession. But remember that with knowledge comes strength. Maybe what is needed is a panel that decides how many details need to be divulged to the general public. So then some weirdo isn’t able to use the info to perpetuate their fetish.
    As for you, my dear, you are always a breath of freshness, Keep up the good work!

     
  23. Melbelle October 25, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jessica I whole heartedly agree with you. We have been through a parents worse nightmare – our precious little girl died suddenly just before her fifth birthday. How we made it through the next unbearable days, weeks and months I still don’t know. The love of our family, care of our friends and kindness of stranegs was amazing but I really don’t know how I would have reacted to media knocking on our door. One thing to come from this tragedy is I am now no longer afraid of grief – either my own or another bereaved person. I know I can’t stop the pain, no matter what I say the that breaking will not heal any faster- it is not my responsibilty nor is it possible. What I can do is just be there, hold their hand. hug them as they cry. Grief is a brutal process and one that should not be displayed as a news bite. Thank-you for your compassion and insight.

     
  24. Anna February 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I agree … I am a trained journalist and I love most aspects of it. But I would never go into broadcast because I could never do that to a grieving family. We were told at uni that it would come up. Nobody said we had to do it, but refusing isn’t exactly encouraged. Who does it help aside from TV executives? If my inability to use the suffering of others to boost my career means I’ll never make it as a journalist, then so be it.

     
  25. Amelia February 14, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I clearly remember being told about the ‘death knock’ when I studied journalism. Not ever being able to see myself having the courage to do this was one of the reasons I knew I wasn’t tough enough for journalism.

     
  26. Sleuthcity April 19, 2012 Reply
     
     

    As a baby journo I was once comforted after a death knock story by my chief of staff recalling his glory days of urinating on front windows of houses with the photographer taking the subsequent photos of grieving families looking ‘distraught’ when in reality they were in shock seeing a journo urinating on their front window. Ah those were the days. That said, many times my distaste was overcome by the need of families to talk about the tragedy and thank those who had helped them. Go to funerals Jess because they are all about the living.

     
  27. Carmel April 23, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Well said Jessica. And from the comments there appears to be a lot of journalists agree. Could those with contacts in the journalism field spread the word that we as viewers do NOT want to see distressed families, and the journalists do not want to go after those stories.

     
  28. Wendy Ashdown April 29, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Well done Jessica, funerals are the worst part of living, good on you for taking a stance

     
  29. KatPlint July 24, 2012 Reply
     
     

    The irony of this article Jessica. You wrote this on my daughters anniversary and the day that National Day was created for Drowning Prevention and Awareness. I thank you for your compassion

    As I deal with the media regularly there are some journalists that I do not ever wish to deal with. When our daughter died the print media in QLD in the rural regions were invasive, unjust and downright rude and untruthful. Some media articles tipped me to the point that I tried to kill myself. Our children who were teens were tormented by photographers at school, these children were at the time protected by a media clause in our Family Court orders to my former husband.

    I have seen the media do their job well and I have both positive (more so) than negative dealings with them. I can certainly offer some advice to those willing to do the death knock. DONT DO IT. you want a story all well and good but these are human beings and yes there is nothing like the news of a death story especially when its a child.

    I agree with Jessica and what she said, maybe just reporting the tragedy and saying we havent sought comment from the family would be a great idea. With any drownings especially involving children I am always willing to aid the media in a story about PREVENTION and AWARENESS. Tragedies happen but I suggest the media help the community for the better good and promote the prevention messages as opposed to putting poor mum and dad on the public crucifix for ridicule. Sadly child death is very stigmatised, no one understands how it happens, sadly they are all too common and many accidents are preventable.

    Together advocates, media and the families can work together but give the family time to grieve and show them respect. Honour the dead first and foremost.

    I would like to ask that No media attend a funeral I find it highly disrespectful unless you have been invited by the family.

     
  30. Alberta July 24, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I write as someone recently bereaved, to say that funerals for about respect, respect for both the living and the dead. They serve an important and powerful role for good. The sad thing I have noticed is just how many people do not say a thing, don’t ask how you are doing, don’t acknowledge the enormity of your recent experience. Maybe for fear of upsetting you. Personally I feel upset by their failure to offer a few empathic words.
    I always believed we must rise above our personal discomforts to do the right and proper thing.

     
  31. Rhoda July 25, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I’ve often thought the same, Jessica. I don’t need to see the grief. I don’t need to see the instrument of death either or the place. News is supposed to inform not sensationalize. There seems to be an obsession with people’s private lives these days and it is devaluing our society. Makes me feel like a pimp to be honest.

     
  32. The Accidental Housewife August 1, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Jessica, I knew your opinion on this before I read this article, even though we’ve never met – I saw it in your eyes every time you had to introduce a story of this nature. And that’s why I love you as a news presenter. You actually have empathy. I admire you.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

porno porno sex

Talking About Dementia

Your Score:  

Your Ranking:  

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Alice Smith: Well put, and I hope to see your documentary. I hate the idea of vaccinations and believe they can be harmful individual...

  • Misty: What a fabulously challenging topic. Jackdan, very well delivered argument. I'd love to see your research. Publish it! ...

  • Wendy Harmer: Thanks jack... a very interesting response and, from my communications with Sonya I think this is exactly the conversati...

  • Jackdan: As someone who doesn't follow the Australian Vaccination schedule, I already feel like I am risking ridicule and worse p...

Freebies

loading time: 0.67 sec