• We have had several children over a timespan which has seen support for mothers increased, so I agree with Not That Bad in that things are much better now than the were even when we had our first child 20 years ago, however, that doesn't mean that "things" are as they should be! I am slightly shattered that even after all of these years of struggle and work, that the role of men and women is not more equal, and that the gender difference is still so debated. All parents deserve society's support: single parents, fathers, mothers. We should be working towards a society where men and women feel supported whatever their choices, and this doesn't necessarily mean financially. Access to services, education, self-finance. We should all be being encouraged to fulfil our potential as human beings. We have the brains, we have the capacity (economics is, after all, a human invention---not a creature with a life of its own) to make the changes. Attitudes need to change. Colour, race, marital status, having children, not having children.... Children are precious and deserve out attention, and parents deserve society's support. If that is given, then we may get the society we deserve! - Dodieh
  • @Robyn. You're the one with the attitude. Over it! - metoo
  • Yah pronking & smiling - Jay
  • Tony Abbott thinks Superannuation is a confidence trick? So what would he think of the national savings that would have been if this had been allowed to remain Australian Law. At the 1937 federal election, the United Australia Party had promised to introduce a system of national insurance that would provide medical cover and pensions for working people. The scheme was to be funded by contributions from government, employers and employees. Menzies, who had helped draft the policy, was an enthusiastic supporter of the scheme. For him it constituted good social policy and, once adequate superannuation funds had been accumulated, promised to relieve taxpayers of what was likely to become an intolerable burden in the future. Unfortunately the United Australia Party’s coalition partners were not nearly so keen about the proposal. Although a National Insurance Bill was passed, Country Party ministers continued to resist its implementation, arguing that the money was needed elsewhere, particularly to provide for ‘adequate defence’. After a series of stormy meetings, Cabinet succumbed to Country Party threats and decided to repeal the pension provisions of the Bill. Menzies immediately resigned from the ministry. - johnward154
  • Never have and never will purposefully buy a celebrity endorsed product. Make my own choices according to years of experience. I don't watch or listen to commercial tv or radio or read mainstream media . Abc, Sbs plus community radio (bay fm 99.9) are my choice. Find very vacuous the current obsession with all things celebrity! - Robyn
  • Maybe hard to be honest ..... but I think probably most of us are little influenced by advertising especially with gorgeous hot men and sexy women, we would probably all look beautiful even though we get older ..... as Dolly Parton said in an interview, you have no idea how expensive it is to look so cheap.. ;-) - Tone May
  • I have honestly never purchased anything because of a celebrity endorsement. After all, they are being paid to promote the product even if they don't actually use it. If I want to make a decision about a product purchase, I do my research on consumer review sites on the web and then decide whether to purchase or not. - Aeron Winters
  • Nicole a great actress??? I do not agree and she has put me off buying Swisse products - Shani
  • Excellent reporting. - Lorraine
  • Ummmmm....slightly embarrassed to say I loved the Brad Pitt Chanel ad. Haven't bought any and not likely too either but I believe the purpose of an ad is to get your attention and it certainly got mine. Unlike myriad other ads that I see time and time again and remember the ad but can't recollect what the heck the product is that they are advertising. - Jenny
 
0
Categories:  Things We Love [Online]

THE NEW YORKER: OLYMPIC COVERS

By The Hoopla
July 26, 2012

Over the course of its 87 years, The New Yorker has featured many Olympics-inspired covers.

The images comment not so much on the Games themselves, but often on where they were held.

My favourite is this cover from the 1956 Melbourne Olympics, the first held outside of Europe and North America. Gold!

To view the slide show, visit The New Yorker.

- Caroline Roessler, Editor

 

 

 

support us

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

porno porno sex

FEATURED CONTRIBUTORS

Talking About Dementia
Get Started!

Your Score:  

Your Ranking:  

Hoopla Poll

If you are menopausal - what is your menopause treatment approach?

Comments

  • Dodieh: We have had several children over a timespan which has seen support for mothers increased, so I agree with Not That Bad ...

    Reply|Read all

  • metoo: @Robyn. You're the one with the attitude. Over it!

    Reply|Read all

  • Jay: Yah pronking & smiling

    Reply|Read all

  • johnward154: Tony Abbott thinks Superannuation is a confidence trick? So what would he think of the national savings that would have ...

    Reply|Read all

Freebies

Copyright © 2012 The Hoopla

All Rights Reserved

Site by Feel.
loading time: 0.68 sec