The SheKilda festival of Aussie women crime writers is on next weekend. Tales of dastardly deeds have enthralled us forever. From the intrigue of Agatha Christie to the blunt instrument of TV series, Underbelly, there are myriad ways to take your crime. Tell us whether you prefer craftily written thrillers; gritty TV dramas; gripping films or the genre of gruesome, true-life forensic files. Give us their names and whereabouts. Or if it’s not your thing. Give us an alibi.
Hi Wendy and Sarah – being one of the organisers of the SheKIlda Women’s Crime Writing Conference, it wouldn’t surprise you to know that I’m a huge crime fiction reader. I prefer fiction to true crime. A true crime needs to be really written and do more than just play to our vicarious sides to get me reading it. Chloe Hooper’s The Tall Man is an amazing piece of true crime writing.
As far as crime fiction and television goes, I prefer the grittier stuff to the cozies.
I am a true-crime author and I think that crime – whether it’s fiction or non-fiction – gives us an insight into a world where human emotions and reactions are at the extreme. For those of us who have read a book on the Yorkshire Ripper or other terrible crimes, I think we do it to see if we can find an answer. How does this happen? What makes these offenders so different from the average person? Nature or Nuture? I think true-crime stories try to explore these things. Having said all of that, I am now writing funny crime fiction to lighten things up, so I guess I staddle that fence; a little on either side.
Hey Jacqui – imagine meeting you here
I’m with Jacqui on the grittier side – on TV a number of the Scandinavian series have really appealed. I’m not a fan of those forensic styled (mostly it seems American series) around as I’m more interested in the why than the how / or the wizbangery. On the fiction side I’ve been a reader of crime fiction for more years than I’m comfortable admitting to, and I also tend more to the psychological thriller end of the scale as a personal preference – but I read / review as much as I possibly can from different styles as there is such a wide range of options available to readers of all tastes (including here – we’ve got some fabulous crime writers in this country). I do read True Crime as well, but again my personal preference is for books that look at the why more than anything from the sensationalist side of the scale.
I too am one of the SheKIlda organisers, and a crime writer myself. I love all kinds of crime but prefer fiction – even though I write both.
And Wendy – et al – if you’re interested in the forensics of crime, then come along to SheKilda because (it’s all interesting) we will be having ‘a body’ by the pool and a panel in which real-life experts – a cop, a forensic pathologist and an forensic entomologist – will SOLVE that crime.
Thrillers for sure, the ones where you are on the edge of your seat. I love being afraid!!! Mysteries are great as well. I am fascinated by the forensic investigations. Basically I love CRIME.
Hi Sarah and Wendy,
as a crime author and delighted participant in SheKilda next week, I’m fascinated by how people have different feelings on whether the crime they read about/watch is real. A number of readers I’ve talked to prefer fiction to true crime because they can tell themselves it’s not real (plus the ending is satisfying where in real life this isn’t always the case). A number of other readers prefer true crime as they feel fiction doesn’t give them enough precisely *because* it’s made-up. Two sides of the same coin? What does everyone else think?
cheers,
Katherine
http://www.katherinehowell.com
Can’t wait for SheKilda. I like all types of crime writing. From Dexter to Harlan Coban to Daisy Dalrymple to Leigh Redhead. Plus home grown Helene Young and Bronwyn Parry. Prefer some romance in the mix but not always. Helen Garner’s Joe Cinque’s Consolation remains a favorite true crime.
I love fictional crime, writers like the brits, Elizabeth George, Peter James, Peter Robinson, and yanks like J>D>Robb(crimes in the middle of the 21st cent), Leigh Childs, Harlan Coben, David Baldacci. Terrific, also I love historial romance, as written by our own Stephanie Laurens, so one lot balances the other. I think it is really good, dont want to read the newspapers about real crime, just do the crosswords(not cryptic, I am simple person).
I have been reading crime fiction for all of my adult life. I recently went cold turkey because I realised I was reading more and more things that nauseated me but because of the conventions of the genre, felt comfortable and comforting.
I think I will return to my old favourites which are more along the sleuth line and seem to me to be relatively less exploitative and gratuitous.
I wrote about my turn-off moment on my blog here: http://tortoisetales2.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/on-literature-gratuitousness-and-things-that-make-you-squirm/
When the next Phryne Fisher comes out I’ll have to dust off my detective hat but for now I’m enjoying a break from all the pain on the page.
Mary Moody: I'm not crazy about crime writing, although I have read Gabrielle Lord's books and they are absolutely gripping. As for television, my husband is addicted to 'dead body shows' as I call them. I sometimes feel guilty leaving him alone in front of the box, so one night I decided to hang in for an episode of one of his favourite forensics. The opening scene showed two fishermen in a dinghy discovering the body of a newborn baby in an old esky that was floating in the water. Now call me old-fashioned, but watching stuff like this does not relax me after dinner. I left him to it!
What do you think of this response from Mary Moody? Click here to have your say
Fiona Scott-Norman: Mmm. Not an anorak when it comes to crime. I used to love the Agatha Christie films - all those hats and deco frocks! - and I frigging adore Dexter. Recently got into Kate Atkinson. On the whole, though, I've seen too much crime fiction inhaled at old people's homes for me not to feel like it's what you do when you've got no life left.
What do you think of this response from Fiona Scott-Norman? Click here to have your say
Tara Moss: I like my crime old-school (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes), with authenticity (Crime & Investigation Network), reality (Anne Rule), great research (Lynda La Plante), and with a fair bit of drama (13th Street Universal). I love a story with female strength (Prime Suspect), the odd psychopath (Thomas Harris' Hannibal Lecter/Patricia Highsmith's Ripley), and possibly a touch of naughtiness (Leigh Redhead's Simone Kirsch). And I certainly like my crime hard-boiled. As Raymond Chandler would say, 'When in doubt, have a man come through the door with a gun in his hand.'
What do you think of this response from Tara Moss? Click here to have your say
Charlotte Wood: I have never been much of a crime reader or watcher - I hate the feeling of adrenaline, so most of my crime to date has been taken in the hilariously pathetic form of Midsomer Murders - the only crime show on TV that involves no adrenaline whatsoever. Gotta love Inspector Barnaby, the crinkled old devil.
Part of the reason I don't much turn to TV crime is that I get very weary of seeing young women's bodies on morgue slabs. Why is it always women who are chopped up in pieces, and sexually tortured, and mutilated, and so on? Sounds earnest, I suppose, but gahd I get sick of it.
That said, I have two absolutely favourite newish female crime fighters.
The first is Sarah Lund, the protagonist of the brilliant Danish series The Killing. I didn't watch this for ages because of the title, but when I finally did I was completely gripped by the psychological realism and the tenderness of it as much as the plot. Still a girl who gets the chop, but the structure of the series, in staying with one crime and attending as much to the family as the cops for the whole series, is very moving. Not to mention completely edge-of-the-seat gripping. Not sure if I will be able to watch series 2 when it comes; I could be way too anxious.
My other favourite new crimebuster is Nhu ‘Ned’Kelly, the flawed young Vietnamese-Australian detective and star of PM Newton’s brilliant novel The Old School. PM Newton was herself a Sydney homicide detective for 13 years, and she brings to Ned’s experience all the truth one would expect of such experience, as well as a freshness and integrity that is completely refreshing. It’s an absolutely gripping read, but also a brilliant portrayal of women in Australian policing, and captures a point in time quite wonderfully. I wouldn’t recommend any fiction, crime or other, that wasn’t well written – and PM Newton can WRITE, sister. I understand she is working on a sequel and I can’t wait to see what happens to Ned next.Go read The Old School now.
Latest 2 of 4 comments
Oh but woops I must make clear that The Killing and The Old School have absolutely nothing in common with Midsomer Murders! i.e. they both gave me the scary adrenaline jitters bigtime.
I’m thinking that Wendy better steer clear of The Killing, don’t you Charlotte? The scene where the parents return home from identifying their daughter to break the news to her two little brothers, and – instead of the usual cut-away – we are made to sit with that grief …..
I was in bits, and not because it was gratuitous, or emotionally manipulative but because it was honest.
Joss Whedon said that the most disrespectful thing you can do to a character is to kill them. The Killing shows how you do it, and make it mean something.
Thanks for your kind words about the book Charlotte.
View all commentsWhat do you think of this response from Charlotte Wood? Click here to have your say
Sarah Maddison: Crime fiction and crime TV are such a deliciously guilty pleasure - unfortunately not one shared by my soft hearted partner who just finds it distressing. But my love of crime certainly makes travelling for work far more bearable - a night in a hotel room allows me to indulge my love of crime TV til late...
What do you think of this response from Sarah Maddison? Click here to have your say
Wendy Harmer: I confess to watching Forensic Files on Foxtel ( even though husband thinks I am a ghoul). I'm fascinated by the science of forensics- how analysis of a stray fibre, tyre track or footprint can solve a crime. I'm amazed by the advances in technology.
I'm less attracted by the real (or manufactured) human emotion surrounding a crime in film, TV and novels. I like the facts, m'am, nothing but the facts. For me it's: "Take this down to forensic".
You might say I'm cold-hearted, but it's the opposite. I can't deal with the immense pain and loss wreaked by murder, so I can only deal with the science of it.
But I still can't look away and I feel quite guilty about that.
I once flipped through the pages of a book about the Yorkshire Ripper and was utterly nauseated and never bought it. There are just some images I don't want ever implanted in my brain.
What do you think of this response from Wendy Harmer? Click here to have your say