• Why do I get the impression that John Jay is either a fan of or an agent for the Westboro Baptist 'church'? - Will Marshall
  • Why is it that whenever there is a natural disaster in the USA our media is full of it for days? But if something happens elsewhere in the world, it's hardly mentioned, if at all. The Victorian bush fires and the Queensland floods were mentioned one day in the US media and forgotten the next - but we get a barrage every time there is a storm over there and it lasts for weeks with all sorts of stories about answered prayers and heroism - which never seems to happen anywhere else in the world. Have you ever also noticed that if there is a blizzard or a heat wave, it always stops at the Canadian border? None of these things ever happen in Canada. This constant Americanisation really gets up my nose. I have met adult Australians who didn't really understand that we are not part of the USA. I fully understand why the French are so ... French - and want to stay that way and not become a cultural colony of America as we have become. - Jack Richards
  • says so much about the human animal bond - life's experiences teach you who is loyal and truly loving and they are the ones you're most likely to reach for when you're at your lowest - melissa
  • Gee Jack, you've sure stirred up all pumpkin-scone bakers from Akerman's blog. They must be desperate for attention to chase you all the way to here. I think many of those extreme-right women secretly have the hots for you - and that's why they go out of their way to find you. By the way, I read your comments on Rudd's blog about SSM. I couldn't agree more! - Yasmina
  • Congratulations PJ and team!! A beautiful garden. Connecting to nature is what it's all about. - Fairy The Green One
  • Yes, and you are about as far from being a "rocket surgeon" as anyone who has ever graced this site. - Wendy Harmer
  • Relax Harry, I normally leave my contributions to online debate to a single entry or two but the response to my very brief comment led me into this discussion. You're right to say I had some connection with the writing, hence my joining in. But the connection was based on my not liking it. That's fair enough, people write pieces for sites like this in the full knowledge that they will be critiqued and that not everyone will like what they have said. If authors don't like it, they shouldn't put their writing out there. You may have noticed that I was not alone in criticising the article and so far no one has actually rebutted any of the points I have made - just complained about the way I have made them. If you disagree with the substance then go ahead and say where. I remember well being 16, but I'm not sure that it has much to do with what I wrote. Whatever poor behaviour I exhibited then - and there surely was some - my mum didn't write open letters about it to the paper or whatever media were available then. You've engaged me online without actually suggesting where I was wrong, but have you had a word with your mum re. what she publicly implied about the behaviour exhibited by you and your siblings? I gotta admit being part of this thread has been pretty enjoyable but it's probably for the best that I normally wouldn't have time to follow something like this over a couple of days - one could get sucked int pretty easily I guess. - Sly Place
  • The freckled duck is not rare. Its listed as 'Least concern' on the UICN red list. Just because CADS say its rare, doesnt mean they are telling the truth. Of course CADS had armed protestors willing to attend shooting locations. Laurie Levy openly admits that his supporters were prepared to break the law to achieve their goal. So heres an alternative hypothesis. CADS descended on the (officially) unattended, unmonitored Box Flats, and chose to make martyrs of several hundred birds to further their cause. It doesnt take a rocket surgeon to understand that that is just as plausible a situation as a rogue hunter. - leigh
  • so lovely, I am glad she got him back safely! aww :) - sami
  • So in 2015 a ranking of 70 and above will be mandatory for entry to University in NSW. So even if school standards are lifted for all by a massive increase in funding only the top 30% of year 12 graduates will be eligible for a University qualification? Or to put it another way approx 70% of year 12 graduates will not qualify to be considered for a university education. Now that's exclusive. I understand why University funding has been cut. Why focus so heavily on increasing the funding at school level only? - Michelle
 
Categories:  Must see, News and Opinion

THE SURPRISING TONY ABBOTT

Surprise is a delight in politics. But there is no surprise in a caricature. And this is what our politicians have become.

Julia Gillard: unionist, lawyer, political staffer, Western Bulldogs fan, unmarried and shock, horror, once interviewed in her own house with no fruit in her fruit bowl.

Tony Abbott: conservative Catholic, apprentice priest, married with three daughters, Rhodes scholar, boxing champion, anti-abortion, a hard man with a hard line.

We want to know the identities of our politicians more as policies merge closer together. We want to know their character because we can’t believe they will deliver their promises. We hope to get a handle on how our leaders will frame policies in the three years in between elections when we have no control.

But how well do we know anybody – in public or in private? As a political reporter, I have been part of boxing our politicians and public figures. History and politics are not served by ambiguity. Everyone wants a pronouncement. Is he right or wrong? Is she black or white?

Identity is a little more nebulous than that.

One of the more interesting characters kicking around Macquarie Street in the 1990s was Malcolm McGregor. Talk about black and white.

He lived politics 24/7. He was renowned as ruthless, like the rest of the NSW Right. He worked for former NSW Labor leader, now foreign minister, Bob Carr. McGregor shared Carr’s love of history and had an amazing knowledge, spanning Australia, the US and the military.

He could quote ground breaking political speeches and some obscure ones besides. He was funny, charming, and did a mean impersonation of Paul Keating. A reformed alcoholic, his was a life lived at 1,000 miles an hour.

He shocked us all by switching to work for the Liberal Party, including John Hewson as Opposition Leader. He would not be put in a box. And then, he returned to the Australian Army. He has been a platoon commander, an infantry soldier, a teacher of his beloved history and most recently as Lieutenant Colonel, speech writer and advisor to the Chief of Army, David Morrison. He was made a member of the Order of Australia for exceptional service to the Australian Army.

For all his other talents, McGregor was ever the cricket nut. He has that beautiful capacity to write cricket for non-believers. So it was that he began writing a An Indian Summer of Cricket (Barrallier Books, 2012). As the creative process began, so did a gender dysphoria first diagnosed in the 1980s.

Back then, McGregor had chosen to ignore it and “man up”. But as the writing and despair continued, McGregor decided he would make the biggest change of his life. He would become a woman called Cate. It was like mate, she said.

The overwhelming response to her sex change from the triumvirate of Macho Industries – politics, army and cricket – was surprise. And immediate support. Morrison refused her resignation twice, telling Cate: “I’ve got your back covered”.

 

Malcolm (left) and Cate (right) McGregor. Image via The Herald Sun.

 

 Page 1 of 2 next >>
support us

45 Responses to this article

  1. jonah stiffhausen December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Gabrielle,
    what a wonderful article.
    Just thought I’d get in first.

     
  2. mudhouse jane December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Scracth the surface and you see unimaginable depths. I have renewed respect for Julia Gillard now that she is less of a Labor parrot.

    For Tony Abbott: I will relate a story from the mid 90s where I had to delicately manage the “communication” about a much loved male staff member who was going to re-emerge, after surgery, as a woman. As Kate was coming back to work, we wanted to make things as comfortable as possible. What blew me away was the reaction of the blokiest blokes. They couldn’t have been more loving and supportive. That was when I saw the authentic people that they were.

    Times like this are when the crap often drops away, even if only temporarily. If politicians (male and female) could be real all the time, and not feel under constant pressure to be big swinging dicks, then maybe we would get some sensible decision making. Maybe we would get more of the right people going into politcs, too.

     
  3. Doc December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Not sure who I respect more, Cate for the bravery & honesty of the change or Morrison for the solid back-up.

     
  4. jodie December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Oh Hoopla, another header that bears little resemblance to the content. Abbott is not ‘surprising. He hasn’t changed since university. But connecting him to someone who has undergone a sex change – now that’s surprising!

     
  5. paul of hay December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    abbott proved what sort of man he was when he walked away from pregnant girlfriend.
    the fact the it later turned out he wasn’t father does not matter one iota, at the time they both (well him for sure) thought he was father.
    what a creep.
    that has been his pattern all his life, leaving seminary,
    and today cuts and runs from press conferences.
    cowards and leopards never change their spots.

     
    • jonah stiffhausen December 5, 2012 Reply
       
       

      “abbott proved what sort of man he was when he walked away from pregnant girlfriend.
      the fact the it later turned out he wasn’t father does not matter one iota, at the time they both (well him for sure) thought he was father.”

      I would have thought the confusion left him little choice but to walk away. His girlfriend obviously had the morals of a whore.

       
      • ian December 5, 2012 Reply
         
         

        And Abbott? Was he a whore too jonah? takes two to tango doesn’t it??

         
        • jonah stiffhausen December 6, 2012 Reply
           
           

          Ian old Son,
          I suggest you get yourself a dictionary. The definition of a whore therein is “a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money; prostitute; harlot; strumpet.”
          Perhaps the word you’re after is libertine?
          Don’t mention it.

           
  6. Ann Noyd December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    If u r a journo why r u editorializing (shock horror no fruit etc.) Just give us the facts. We don’t need to know how u vote though that’s fairly clear.

     
  7. Caz December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    What a sick world we live in! I just hope I never have to share the same loo as “Cate” on a tour bus or see “her” at a CWA meeting.

    This is the sort of thing that socialism leads to – all manner of deviance and perversion and a hair-dressers defacto living in The Lodge with not a piece of fruit in the bowl. I’ll bet she can’t even bake a sponge.

    Tony Abbott is a man of God and I just hope he brings back some Chritian decency into our lives when he gets to be PM.

     
    • mudhouse jane December 5, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Well, I was thinking of joining the CWA, but now I am not so sure. I am hoping that what you have written is a joke and is meant to reflect your (pretend) evil twin. Te he he.

       
      • Caz December 5, 2012 Reply
         
         

        No, no, no I am the real Caz. That other one is a soy-latte sipping socialist who rides a bicyle in size 40 lycra shorts. I’m more of a soul-mate with Joan of Parkes who made a very sensible comment on Akerman’s blog today. It was a work of art; the literary equivalent of the Cyst-ine Chapel. It’s on p.4. of his comments and is a “must read” for every feminist. But hold on to your lower organs in case you laugh so much you have a prolapse.

        I don’t know whether they’d let you in to the CWA. But if you can master Lady Flo Bjelke-Petersen’s recipe for pumpkin scones, it might make all the difference.

         
    • Janet G December 5, 2012 Reply
       
       

      I love your black humour and your Dame Edna glasses, Caz,

       
  8. Mary Longford December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Jodie, agree!

     
  9. monica attard December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Lovely story Gabrielle… I knew Malcolm. Glad she’s Cate.

     
    • Cate McGregor December 17, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Thanks Monica. Appreciate the support. Hope you take a look at the book. I made right decision-belatedly. As for Caz if she doesn’t lime sharing the loo with me she can use a tree.

       
  10. Campbell December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    interesting read

     
  11. K.bites December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Would have been a much more interesting and remarkable story if the transexual woman, Cate had managed to achieve all that the heterosexual bloke, Malcolm was able to. Doesn’t say much about Abbott either way.

     
  12. Evie December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    “I would have thought the confusion left him little choice but to walk away. His girlfriend obviously had the morals of a whore.”

    “Tony Abbott is a man of God and I just hope he brings back some Chritian decency into our lives when he gets to be PM.”

    Ah, I see the puritans have arrived.

     
  13. Evie December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    PS: there’s nothing actually in this article which explains or puts the case forward for Abbott being a “complicated” man other than his (time and again) inability to compartmentalise his faith, his attitudes towards women and politics. I’m by no means a fan of Julia Gillard’s stance on asylum seekers or her hypocrisy when it comes to single-parent welfare, but I am also not a fan of the press gallery’s insistence on dismissing her misogyny speech as a powerplay or a blip on the radar when it quite starkly pointed out how abysmally women are addressed in politics by men in power alongside them.

    As a political writer I would hope that you would challenge the supposed caricatures of Tony Abbott that you claim have been purported by the media, but you’ve done nothing of the sort.

     
  14. Tracy December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Would have preferred to give this a miss. News please.

     
  15. carole/m December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Well I was just about to congratulate JONAH for making a comment without having to name call & denigrate women but alas I hadn’t read his 2nd comment, which reverts to his usual need to demean in order to boost his false sense of superiority.

    If she’s a whore, He’s a whore you cretin.

    Please excuse my outburst but I’ve had a gutful of this idiot.

     
    • jonah stiffhausen December 6, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Carole/m,
      It’s time for your medication dear.

      I wonder if this outburst qualifies as “hate speech”? Is there a legal vulture in the house?

       
    • jonah stiffhausen December 6, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Carole dear,
      see my post to Ian above re the meaning of words.

       
  16. JoanneH December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Tony Abbott didn’t show much empathy with his “sometimes shit happens” comment re. events surrounding the death of an Australian soldier, or when he implied that dying asbestos campaigner Bernie Banton was a liar, or on all the occasions when he has uses asylum seekers as political footballs.
    He has threatened to cut overseas aid, and tried turning natural disasters into squalid political gains (Abbott opposed flood levy, but wanted donations to Liberal Party instead).

    The only time Abbott has displayed anything like human sympathy was when he was fighting to save his billionaire mining mates from having to pay a tiny percent of their bloated profits into what he sneeringly termed “another great big new tax”.

     
  17. RobynMarie December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    @jonah – really? the morals of a whore? Where do you get off saying that about someone you don’t know and a situation you were not in? You have the morals of a shit

     
    • ian December 5, 2012 Reply
       
       

      RobynMarie, I’m even more surprised that jonah can make sexist comments like that on a website like this!!

       
  18. Tony W December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    “Where do you get off saying that about someone you don’t know and a situation you were not in?”

    Yes I agree with that. While it’s not unreasonable it to question the morals of a woman who falls pregnant to someone other than her boyfriend, we’d need to know more about the context before passing judgement. We’re not talking adultery here – many if not most single young men and women are serial monogamists, generally with a bit of overlap, which is often unavoidable. There wouldn’t be many young people who’ve never been caught up in a love triangle. Nor does that imply concurrent sexual partners – in fact in my observation, that’s generally the province of men.

    It comes back to the old double standards in society – men are playboys, women are damned whores and God’s police.

    “You have the morals of a shit”

    I wouldn’t jump to that conclusion either. A view of women informed by religion does not imply immorality. Nor should we pretend that all women are paradigms of virtue.

     
  19. carole/m December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Jonah is a Misogynist. Let’s call him for what he is, he’s an insult to the intelligent women who chose to contribute to this terrific site.

     
    • jonah stiffhausen December 6, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Carole dear,
      finding the tenets of “feminism” hilarious does not a misogynist make. Or a troll, whatever they are. Actually I love you gals, but hate to hear you spoiling yourselves by being “assertive” and know-allish.
      Sweet and demure, do ya hear?
      C’mon, you can do it.

       
  20. ro.watson December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I, for one, am glad there is some editorial control on this site, as I see my reference to morals and pooh have been junked. Meanwhile who picks up after babies and dogs, and thank goodness for a flushing toilet,and the good grace of pooh to leave our bodies~never to be seen again.

     
  21. ro.watson December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Oh Carole,oh Jonah. I have never been good at the splits. I do draw the line at hate speech.

     
  22. ro.watson December 5, 2012 Reply
     
     

    And yip, Carole, the old spade is a spade~ here is a misogynist for all to see. I wonder about the back story to make someone so socially impaired?

     
    • jonah stiffhausen December 6, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Ro,
      I’ll see your misogynist and raise you a misandrist.

       
  23. Tony W December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    “But every so often, observers get a glimpse of a more complex man.”

    Haha, I suspect we’ll be seeing a lot more puff pieces next year as journalists attempt to acquaint us with the inner workings of the man who may be leading the nation soon. After all, they’ve got to write something, and there sure as hell won’t be any policy to write about.

    Trouble is, what can you write about the inner workings of a junkyard dog? How do you plumb the soul of a political animal? What can you say about a man with no convictions beyond religion, a self confessed “weather vane” on climate change, the very policy upon which he has publicly staked his entire political future?

    Even poor Gabrielle is scratching for material already. The guy writes a book review and we get “The Surprising Tony Abbott”. I’m sure if he baked a cake we’d get “The Enigmatic Tony Abbott”. The only thing even mildly surprising in that book review is his Freudian admission of what every journalist has failed to remark upon – that he is a deeply insecure man, struggling for identity and full of self doubt: “These doubts, I suspect, stem from lack of sufficient faith in the power of our ideals and in our capacity to adapt.”

    Here’s a man who once identified with priests, and now in political life he is still unable to identify himself except by reference to others – “the political lovechild” of John Howard and Bronwyn Bishop, “channelling” Noel Pearson, and endlessly quoting literary figures from bygone eras. He even wheels out his wife and kids to identify him for us. And yet Gabrielle suggests he “would be much better served by letting his authentic voice out.” Has it not occurred to anyone that he is yet to find his own voice?

    The trouble with Abbott is that he believes himself destined for greatness in the service of his fellow man. Or God. Or both. The poor bloke flogs himself mercilessly to fulfil that self imposed obligation. I suspect he really does “think meanly of himself for not having been a soldier.” Now in his 55th year he’s getting desperate – 2013 is his last roll of the dice. Tortured by the memory of 2010, he’ll stop at nothing to prevent this last chance slipping through his fingers so cruelly. Consider the oblivion awaiting him if it does.

    Of course, as a chameleon, with nothing but empty slogans for policy, we’ll never know what kind of PM he’d make unless it actually happens. But then, neither does he. Maybe that’s why he urged McGregor to write a book for people “on the precipice of changing their lives.” Because if he does succeed in his latest quest for self-actualization, the first thing he’ll do as PM is ask himself, “What the f..k do I do now?”

    A more appropriate title for this article would have been “The Man Who Would Be King.” As in Sean Connery. If I recall correctly he came to a rather sticky end.

     
  24. Nat December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    This story doesn’t surprise me. It’s easy to find compassion for those you know personally and professionally. They are real people. It’s a much bigger story to have compassion for a faceless nameless stranger. I have not seen this in abbot. I want to know his policies. I do not trust him due to his previous demonising others who disagree with him.

     
  25. VRog December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Jonah, I really hope you’re just a s&!t-stirrer and not a misogynist, but it seems doubtful. You sound like a lot of MRAs (men’s rights activists) I’ve come across on the interwebs who seem to believe that women having equal rights to men is taking rights away from men. It’s a false equivalency. Women and men having the same rights is a win-win situation. Maybe you need to check your privilege?

     
  26. carole/m December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Well there you are Jonah, were have you been hiding. Still so full of yourself. Wonderful to know that you can actually read a dictionary.

    As you will be aware, Dictionaries change over time to include common usage.
    Maybe it’s time to add “male whore” & “male slut ” & male ……. etc in front of all the other names men like to call women .

    The woman you so arrogantly called a whore must really be a terrible person, hell, she spent more than 20 years of her life raising and educating the child . Let’s give her a big slap down for that. And your mate Tony!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  27. carole/m December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    New must read re the AWU sham.

    http://www.themonthly.com

    Article by John Van Tiggelen, journalist & editor of the monthly.

    December 2012 – January 2013
    Editors Note by John Van Tiggelen

    Gabriel Chan you stated ” I reckon Abbott would be much better served by letting his voice out.
    He may even climb out of the box”.

    Problem for phony Tony is every time he opens his mouth he digs himself a bigger & bigger hole.

    If you read this article by John Van Tiggelen &
    Margo Kingstons ” Tony Abbott and his Slushy Fund” , It would seem that he has no Integrity at all.

    Margo Kingstons article ” Tony Abbott and his Slushy Fund” it’s obvious that he has a huge problem with a lack of Integrity

     
  28. carole/m December 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    whoops !! just ignore the last three lines.

     
  29. Heather December 9, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Well I think Tony W’s comment was a better analysis of Tony Abbott than the above article.

    It appears to me that Chan is bringing The Australian’s prevailing love affair with Tony Abbott to this column.

    Not convinced in any way.

     
  30. Rhoda December 9, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Didn’t really get the point of this article either, sorry.

    My view of Tony Abbott is that he has religion and in a very fifties way. I think it screwed him up to be quite frank. He and his confessor the Cardinal Pell would like nothing better than to return to the good old days although it will never happen now. In fact I’m astonished to find anyone going to church at all these days let alone to confession.

    Religious people do not navigate well. The road to heaven is a very narrow one.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

porno porno sex

Talking About Dementia

Your Score:  

Your Ranking:  

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Will Marshall: Why do I get the impression that John Jay is either a fan of or an agent for the Westboro Baptist 'church'?

  • Jack Richards: Why is it that whenever there is a natural disaster in the USA our media is full of it for days? But if something happen...

  • melissa: says so much about the human animal bond - life's experiences teach you who is loyal and truly loving and they are the o...

  • Yasmina: Gee Jack, you've sure stirred up all pumpkin-scone bakers from Akerman's blog. They must be desperate for attention to c...

Freebies

loading time: 0.97 sec