• No way I'd be voting for Juliar - anyway I'm not in her electorate - but I will not be voting for either party .... and I agree with Claire .... - Maxine
  • @ Dianne: "Agree Tony w. was being deliberately down key." No time to downplay things Dianne, after what they've done to our PM we need to stick the boot into these bullies and give them a taste of their own medicine. Maintain the Rage! - Tony W
  • That'sone of my favourite books too! Yours in messiness... - Wendy Harmer
  • I will be voting for JG on the 14th September. - Claire
  • I agree with Ellen. There's a big difference between saying "she asked for it" (which is complete unacceptable at any level) and thinking it's prudent to not take insane risks with your safety. I don't think that ensuring you have reasonable control of your faculties or avoiding dodgy areas on your own is a female-only thing. My partner (male) was bashed up while walking home in a really bad area at an early hour and was drunk - things he could have avoided. It certainly wasn't his fault, but if he wasn't blotto and caught a cab instead of walking through a scary area, he wouldn't have encountered the gang of cavemen who beat him up. It's all well and good to say "we have a right to do what we want, when we want, and be safe" (what a wonderful world that would be) but the reality is that we have lots of fruit loops with messed up heads living among us. It doesn't matter what you wear or how you act, they're still on a mission to do bad stuff to other humans. I think the self-preservation argument gets swamped by labels of rape apologist and victim-blaming, but I actually don't think it's a gender thing. It's just common bloody sense for women AND men. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, on this one. - catzilla
  • Hmmm, I like the recommendation but not sure I like the angle...there are a plethora of good, evidence-based, reasons/achievements to keep the ALP in and keep Julia Gillard as PM, just not sure that simply being a woman is high on the list. - Amy T
  • Ah, here she is again offering her opinion. The woman who told JG "OK Julia, you have a big arse. Get over it", Well, Germaine, you have a bad habit of sticking your nose where it is not invited. Usually you take the opportunity to denounce and denigrate Australia and those who you feel deserve your acidic comments. I can think of a few to describe you but nobody had asked me. Suffice to say I have always considered you to be a right royal pain in the arse. - Claire
  • @ Steph: "it will be another twenty years before they govern again." That was being said about the Libs after Rudd's landslide victory, they were a rabble under Nelson and Turnbull. They've regrouped under Abbott and he's been the most effective opposition leader we've ever seen, but he'll fall flat on his face in government and even Murdoch won't be able to save him. He'll break his promise on the carbon tax and merely try to reduce the fixed price. He won't manage to Stop the Boats, and his austerity measures will kill off growth and may even shock the economy into recession. Unlike Howard/Costello he won't have access to rivers of gold from any mining boom. The electoral pattern in recent years is massive expectations pre-election and massive disappointment post-election. Think Rudd, Gillard, Bailleau, Newman, O'Farrell. Soon it will be Abbott's turn to live up to the hype, and as his polling inevitably falls there are plenty of would-be LNP leaders waiting in the wings. In other words - deja vu, all over again. - Tony W
  • Robert f blames the Government for the "Insulation stuffup". What stuff up? on the basis of his statement every time a person is killed on a State owned road the Government of that State no matter what persuasion should be blamed because like the insulation scheme all the Government did was finance the scheme. It was the idiot and greedy employers who did not supervise their staff enough. This industry is part of the building industry which is supervised in each State by State Government Building controls. So in this case the blame should more likely be sheeted home to State Governments. - rob pittman
  • Thanks, it is such a nice refreshing change to read something that is not bagging Julia. - Heather
 
Categories:  News and Opinion, Spicer's Spotlight

WE DON’T NEED TO TALK ABOUT KEVIN

EXCLUSIVE: TIM MATHIESON STANDS BY HIS WOMAN!

In conversation with The Hoopla this week, Tim Mathieson, the First Bloke, broke his silence over renewed leadership speculation.

“Julia is working hard to make things better,” he insisted, running his fingers through his tawny-flecked short locks. “We just want to serve the Australian people.”

Hairdresser Mathieson, PM Gillard’s partner, told The Hoopla during a private BBQ, that what drove his partner to stay on in the leadership was a dedication to “public service”.

Mr Mathieson brandished his tongs with passion as he declared  that he never discussed policy with his partner, but that he understood what motivated the woman he calls Julia (because that is, actually, her name) to attain the office of Australian Prime Minister was that “things need to be better”.

“More tomato sauce?” he asked, his concern belied by the flippant slogan on his eye-catching aqua BBQ apron which he admits was given to him by Bob Katter: “Kill a Cow. Start the Fire. The Magic Begins.”

He averted his eyes when The Hoopla asked what was his primary motivation to retain the honorific of “First Bloke”? As such, the first in the nation’s history.

Would he want to continue in the role he has made his own, through all the slings and arrows? Is that why he stands by his woman?

“I don’t know,” he said. “But if I ever agreed to do that, it would be on the proviso that it was completely about the country, the national good, Australia’s place in the world and the people who have, over many years now, told me, ‘Look, we’re vulnerable on this or we’re hurting on that, and things need to be better’. Who’s for another sausage?”

This is an account you will never read. Why?

 

Therese Rein “in eye-catching purple” at lunch with Deborah Snow for The Sydney Morning Herald. Photograph by Paul Harris.

Because men are not expected, nor seen, to back their partners the way women are.

On the weekend, Kevin Rudd’s wife Therese Rein gave an exclusive interview to Fairfax newspapers.

Greens leader Christine Milne excoriated her for “standing by her man”.

Ms Rein responded by tweeting, “Is she saying that as an individual and as a woman I’m not speaking my own mind? Or that what I say has Kevin’s consent. She obviously doesn’t know me very well.”

It got me thinking: why do male leaders need women to fight their battles, but not the other way around?    

To call Therese Rein a smart woman is like saying James Magnussen is a pretty good swimmer. Her international employment agency Ingeus is worth $210 million. When Kevin Rudd was Prime Minister, they were pitched as a power couple.

During the leadership challenge, their daughter Jessica mounted an effective a social media campaign. “Let’s own this spill, people,” she blogged.

I like these women very much. It’s a close and loving family. There’s nothing wrong with supporting each other.

But to say that’s not what you’re doing is disingenuous.

Therese Rein is her own woman. But she knew what questions to expect when she agreed to a lunchtime interview with a senior newspaper journalist. 

Sure, she pretended to be reticent when questions were raised about her husband’s leadership ambitions. But her answers were well rehearsed.

In the words of Christine Milne, “This is Team Rudd letting everybody know that Kevin is ready to be begged to take it on”.

 

 Page 1 of 2 next >>
support us

32 Responses to this article

  1. Sue k July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I love The First Bloke.

     
  2. Alison July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Good article.

     
  3. Rosie July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    My reaction to Therese Rein’s interview was that it was a direct set-up by the Rudd camp to ease us back into thinking of him as PM. Do they really think we can be manipulated so easily? We have moved on. I agree with Sue K – The First Bloke seems like a decent chap who has handled his position with dignity.

     
  4. Paula July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Whatever happened to free speech? The women in 1-KRudd’s life have every right to campaign on his behalf. While this a relatively new phenomenon in Australia, the wives and daughters of politicians regularly participate in the campaign. We all have brains, we can all see what the Rudd camp is doing. Just because we don’t like it, it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be allowed to exercise their democratic right.

     
    • Tracey July 10, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Of course she can do what she wants – and we can read and write articles saying she’s being disingenuous.

       
  5. angela Fooks July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I totally agree we do not ned to talk, or think ,about Kevin !!!!! – and we don’t need Therese to tell us we should . I f only they could begin to think about what is important and support the current government instead of undermining

     
  6. Em July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    The j Rudd piece for mamamia was irritatingly disingenuous & patronizing. Infruriating was mamamia’s equally obtuse defense. Sent me off the whole site.

     
    • Mez July 10, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Absolutely agree. And I wouldn’t call Jessica’s campaign a success. It was an unmitigated disaster.

       
  7. Julie Wright July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    They say men are territorial, but I think some women beat them hands down. Therese is one of them. I think we are over the K-Rudd leadership dispute – very old hat – over it!

     
  8. Bridget July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    If a male partner or child of a female politician came out and spoke about the woman behind the politician, she would be seen as weak and wily. Sadly, we still have a long way to go until gender is relegated irrelevant in the political arena and misogyny, not tolerated.

     
  9. Tracey July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Great comments! Rosie – I was talking to a Labor operative last night who confirmed all of our suspicions – absolutely a Rudd set-up to ease us back into talking about Kevin. Enough!

    And Bridget – excellent point. Imagine if Tim did come out to protect Julia. It would be seen as patronising – and she would be seen as unable to stand up for herself.

    It is all viewed through the prism of gender.

     
    • Helen July 10, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Tracey, “a Labor operative” is like saying “a source close to …” – a common tactic by journalists and/or magazine writers – to attempt to give legitimacy to his/her propositions. Writers should own their words.

       
  10. heather green July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I prefer to think that Ms Rein as an educated, successful businesswoman has something to say.
    Consider this… some highly successful/high profile business leaders/ politicians/journalists even, have partners who are their equal and actually have an opinion…… They are free to express it…. and most of us are interested to read it and decide how we feel about it… Most of us are smart enough to evaluate the situation and to identify the bias and prejudice in the articles we read…..with respect, including yours…

     
  11. Happyeverafterbride July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Great article Tracey! but I disagree that Ms Rein is belittled for standing by her man. I admire her even more for the fact that she is strong enough to support her husband despite the fact that her success is not reliant upon his career.

    Another thought, perhaps its detrimental for female leaders to have their partners speak up on their behalf? It undermines them. I too appreciate the strength of all these successful women in their own regard.

     
  12. mj July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Don’t make the mistake of thinking that Tim Mathieson hasn’t been schooled by the PM’s PR people to behave the way he does. He has. Every move in the game is carefully calculated by advisers, no matter whose name is in the headlines, but especially those associated with the PM. All this sort of fluff just distracts us from the real issues. For instance, I keep wondering when someone with political clout is going to stand up and declare that the changes to Social Security law wrought by the Howard government and still causing untold suffering to students, single parents and unemployed people, are punitive and need immediate amending. Many voted for Labor for that very reason and yet no-one – not Kevin nor Julia – have had the courage nor the principles to address it. They think throwing a little bit of money around from time to time will do the trick, but it’s just a temporary vote-buying exercise. This is just one example of many. Instead of debating which partners said what, lets make our political leaders properly face what is really “hurting” people. And Tim Mathieson, put your money where your mouth is or keep it shut, but don’t pretend to care about what’s really “hurting” people.

     
    • MichelleP July 10, 2012 Reply
       
       

      You do realise the start of the article wasnt real mj? Tracy didnt really chat to Tim…

       
  13. liza July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    What we are seeing today in politics is a blame anyone but me for my problems.
    The Alp are pathetic stating that it was the “Greens” made us do anything .The Greens made us chop off Rudd’s head. The Greens made us lose our way. We never shared their values but were prepared to prostitute ourselves for government.
    If the ALP are that unhappy with the Greens then let them call an election .
    No good bringing in Therese Rein to test the waters for this lot.That is just cowardly.

     
  14. mj July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Thanks MichelleP. Tim Mathieson has been quoted as saying that all his years as a hairdresser have refined his listening skills, which helps when he’s out talking to people in his role as first bloke. And although we may not have seen him at home cooking on the barby, we’ve been privy to his men only shed. My point still stands. We need to debate the real issues with our leaders and not what their partners say or not say.

     
  15. Annie Also July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Typical of a successful woman damning another successful woman by ‘feint praise’.
    Not a nice piece at all.
    Some of us out here are still upset by the knifing of a sitting PM.
    Some of us out here are tired of the movement to the right that the ‘progressive’ Party has made.

    So when some of the commentators here speak of ‘us’ and ‘we’ YOU do NOT speak for me.
    I am a woman and can speak for myself. And if in that I speak of my man and speak up for him and out for him, that does NOT make him weak. It makes US stronger.

    Sad that you had to make it a man/woman first man/first woman thing. So American.

    Like anyone, Tracey, (you for instance) who are in the public eye, even WOMEN have a right and an equality to be asked for interview and their point of view. That is all that was.
    I will talk about anyone I like including Kevin and nasty little Pyne and cruel Abbott or disappointing Gillard.

     
  16. Tracey July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Hi Annie,

    Actually, like I said, I like Therese and Jessica very much. I just don’t like how disingenuous the whole thing is. If they are pushing for another leadership challenge by Kevin – then say it – don’t play games.

    I would love to see energy being put into policy, instead of trying to tear down the existing leader – who happens to be a woman, by the way.

    Cheers.

     
  17. kerry Lynne July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Great comments on here. I must say Tracey I thought your article showed your political bias, however, its great that it has provoked some interesting discourse and women are starting to talk and put forward their views without fear of attack… My own bias will be evident when I say i agree with many points raised by Annie, Liza, Happyeverafterbr, Heather and MJ. Personally I cast my vote based on policy, not gender. I find it curious that people rubbish KRudd when he belongs to the same party as the sitting PM..I am pleased that we are a free country and that we have good capable potential leaders in the wings in both major parties.Fortunately most are men, because I dont want to hear about their blue dress or lovely smile, I just want them to get on and govern according to the policies that the majority voted for. !!!…. Oops… the last vote wasnt a majority was it …. I’ll have to rethink that … :D

     
  18. Wendy Harmer July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Thanks Kerry Lynne… just to qualify last comment. Neither major party (Libs/ALP) came up with a majority after last election. Tony Abbott had the chance to negotiate an operating majority. He failed to do so (even after being offered the possibility of a new election by Independent Tony Windsor).
    The ALP did.
    The charge that this government (like them or not) is illegitimate is incorrect.

    Fundamentally wrong.

    Had Abbott been able to add to his coalition with the National Party and cobble together an operating majority after the election,the same charge may have been laid, but it would still be incorrect.

    Politics is a numbers game, and at this moment, the shaky alliance between the ALP, the Greens and some Independents has the numbers.
    If Mr Abbott can find enough to join his Liberal, National Party alliance, he will have the numbers.

    This is not a conspiracy.
    The side that has the numbers to gain the confidence of the House of Representatives forms government.
    It is standard operating procedure – as set down in our Constitution. http://www.peo.gov.au/students/cl/constitution.html
    Enf of story.

     
  19. Tracey July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Thanks Kerry – love your comment about the blue dress. I always cringe when I read profile pieces about female leaders – or spouses – which focus on what they wear. It’s never an issue when the story is about a man.

     
  20. paul clarke July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    great article, tracey…..Julia may not be able to get her message across always, but it’s nice to know the first bloke has her covered at the barbie! you would need more than listening skills to survive that job. nice to read about him, and sounds like he would be more fun than janette howard to get on the piss with. good luck Tim – we’ll be with you in the election, buddy!

     
  21. Bev July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Good article and points well made, Tracey. I found it demeaning for the very talented Ms Rein to be spruiking for her husband. Tim Mathieson has conducted is life as First Bloke impeccably and seems to be very supportive of his partner without looking for headlines.
    I’m proud that the women have the courage to stand on their own two feet.
    The Rudd push for leadership seems to pop out every fortnight just before the newspoll. It’s a shame that Ms Rein allowed herself to be used.

     
  22. kerry Lynne July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Errmm….Wendy Harmer, your comment requires a little qualification itself.. I did not make the points you addressed your reply to.. My last comment could have quite easily been qualified by the reader having a sense of humour……… :O We all played our part in arriving at a hung parliament. … We may hold slightly different views but surely we both agree they can be delivered with a little good manners and humour …
    I said the last vote wasnt a majority… I did NOT say there was a majority vote cast with one party over the other… why do you raise that ? we all are aware that it was a hung parliament..
    I did NOT charge that our government is illegitimate…. Who said that ?… Why do you raise that ?
    Ive never even heard anyone mention a conspiracy till you just did .
    Standard operating procedure should be for us all to exchange views with good manners … you delivered a philippic under the guise of a reply…

     
    • Wendy Harmer July 11, 2012 Reply
       
       

      It was addressing the broader point many people in the community have ( and if it you’re not one of them, Im sorry) that this government is somehow illegitmate and we are all stopped from having another election by a left-wing conspiracy. It isn’t. We aren’t. You’re right. I do have a sense of humour failure on this point.

       
  23. Mez July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Matheson seems like a good egg. Team Rudd are delusional at best or arrogant, manipulative power-whores at worst. The polls that ask who’s your preferred PM, Gillard or Rudd are to blame for keeping Kev’s hopes alive. The answer from 70% of the population is NEITHER!

     
  24. Jane Cattermole July 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    There’s a long history of leadership challenges in the Labor Party but this is the only time it’s been called “a knifing” or “stab in the back”. To put it in perspective when Gillard’s challenged the first time Rudd, having realising that he had no support in the party room, chose not to contest. He agreed to step down as leader. She then won an election, albeit with the support of Greens & Independents and has had to battle for two years against a hostile media, fuelled by leaking and outright condemnation by Rudd and Co. when he finally formally challenged her for the leadership she won by an overwhelming margin, bigger than any margin in the history of leadership ballots. That should have been the end. The Rudds should have taken a step back and given her the space to lead the government instead of constantly undermining her position. There is no doubt that the latest interview was an attempt to attract leadership speculation once again and it’s no surprise that it coincided with the polls. They need to to take a leaf out of Bob Hawkes book and take it on the chin for the good of the party.

     
  25. Sunny Shamrock July 11, 2012 Reply
     
     

    The problem with all your examples of female leaders not needing the support of their partners is that they all lost in a landslide. I am not saying it was their fault but they are hardly examples to throw at us.

    Live in a bubble if you want but part of the reason people like Kevin is his close family image. The public like it & can relate to it. Does that make it fair? No but it’s reality.

     
  26. Margaret July 11, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Thanks for the note about the Therese Rudd piece. I have had enough of all of the Rudds. Kevin, Therese and the daughter whose name I cannot remember. We admire and respect Therese as the successful business woman she is but enough is enough about the Kevin thing. Get over it.
    Maybe if she had sorted him out when he was in the job it may have had a better outcome. I have just remembered that there are sons in the family so good on them for being invisible.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

porno porno sex

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Maxine: No way I'd be voting for Juliar - anyway I'm not in her electorate - but I will not be voting for either party .... and...

  • Tony W: @ Dianne: "Agree Tony w. was being deliberately down key." No time to downplay things Dianne, after what they've don...

  • Wendy Harmer: That'sone of my favourite books too! Yours in messiness...

  • Claire: I will be voting for JG on the 14th September.

Freebies

loading time: 1.49 sec