• I agree with at least one or two of the statements (and if you'd seen my cousins, you'd be hoping it wasn't that one). The rest are hilarious. I loved Up The Duff and Kidwrangling. Now I'm just about to buy Girl Stuff for my daughter. What a gift that such a warm, clever and funny person has bothered to create these guides to our various stages of life. - Carolyn
  • You a past Labor member? That's a good one! So presumably you were once concerned about social justice. You railed against rampant materialism but because you perceive the ABC and its audiences believe in what you presumably once believed in, you want it slashed and burned and its journos tossed out into the streets? Huh? - Kel
  • Well what's your take on why the ABC PLUS the MSM refuses to investigate the Ashby affair; you know where a federal justice adjudicated that an LNP candidate in concert with Ashby conspired to bring down the government by fraudulently claiming sexual harassment by Slipper. Is this left wing bias? Who gains from non investigation of this issue? Furthermore why won't any journalist including our truth seeker Alberici, ask Pyne why he lied when asked about his dealings with Ashby. What about when Hockey denied meeting with Brough and Brough denied the number of times he had met Ashby. Gee this isn't about left or right wing bias, this is about the truth. Given that Limited News' 70% monopoly is dedicated to bringing down the government how does a citizen learn the truth about any issue confrronting this nation? - Kel
  • There is an issue with semantics regarding this article and Summers' thesis in general, which is the distinction between COURTESY and RESPECT. The social upheavals of the 1960s up-ended the notion that those in positions of authority were automatically entitled to respect. Whilst someone like Gillard shouldn't be subjected to threats, intimidation etc., few politicians have done more to undermine their own credibility. - Nathan
  • Well put, and I hope to see your documentary. I hate the idea of vaccinations and believe they can be harmful individually but we are part of a community and as such, we have responsibilities to each other, so my son'a vaccinations are up to date. The reality is that no one knows what will happen to us or our children, whether we are talking about injury by vaccine, or injury by preventable disease, or running in a marathon where a terrorist is in wait, or getting in a car and being wiped out by a drunk driver. We all do what we can for our kids and we can try and protect them as much as we can - but none of us escape misfortune. I have a friend whose son has shocking tumours and a limited life span. My own son has a platelet disorder which means we have to be constantly vigilant that he doesn't injure himself lest he bleed internally. Let's do what we can for our own - but let's not harm others in the process. - Alice Smith
  • What a fabulously challenging topic. Jackdan, very well delivered argument. I'd love to see your research. Publish it! Sonya, I look forward to tomorrow night's documentary. Thanks for taking (what sounds like) a rational approach. - Misty
  • Thanks jack... a very interesting response and, from my communications with Sonya I think this is exactly the conversation she's hoping for. Be very interested to hear your response after viewing the doco. - Wendy Harmer
  • As someone who doesn't follow the Australian Vaccination schedule, I already feel like I am risking ridicule and worse posting here. We have been hassled and hounded by doctors, nurses (one of us is a nurse) and other parents. Blamed for the resurgence Whooping cough and related deaths, etc. Our stance is that we immunise based on our own needs and intelligence. As a for instance, we are not convinced that our children needed to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B at birth, especially given that the vaccine contained Thiomersal when it was recommended to us. I'm not sure how aware you are of the Japanese experience with the DTP vaccinations in the mid 1970's, but as a result of many adverse reactions and over 30 deaths as a direct result of the vaccine, the schedule was altered and children were vaccinated later. I am aware that the vaccine is no longer a whole cell vaccine, however it is worth considering the delicate balance of the immune system in infants below 6 months of age. So we immunise roughly to the Japanese schedule. There is no Hep B or vericella. And MMR is given as MR and Mumps separately. We will make the call on Japanese when we visit next month. I note that the tone in the promotion of the doco appears to depict the non vaccination school as driven by emotion with the pro vaccination argument being driven by Science (which is a pretty broad concept). Our decision to vaccinate alternatively has been based on a lot of careful research and is based on risk mitigation considering that vaccinations do carry a percentage of risk, however small. We have the advantage of also being Japanese citizens, (myself a spouse resident) and can access the differently combined vaccines and scheduling. When recently discussing this on a facebook post I was branded an anti Vaccinator. Abused and blamed. My response is that I think there is a better way. A much better way. And the heavy handed pressure to Immunise to schedule, which then elicits a strong anti response from those who question, but are discouraged strongly and frowned upon for questioning, has created a climate of 'for or against', emotion or science, us against them. All pretty narrow reductive way to explore a whole collection of different diseases, risks, and vaccines (including their varieties of compositions, combinations and timing). So we have attempted to immunise the best way that we can ascertain. It's a tricky time consuming task to get all the info on each different vaccine from the manufacturers, to research each and every disease to ascertain the risks of actually contracting it and then what the risks associated with the disease are, but it has been worthwhile. I think that the community could benefit from a less doctrinal approach to the current immunisation schedule and regular review of disease risks and the vaccination schedule response. - Jackdan
  • I'm an E cup. When I was younger and skinnier I was only a C cup and could handle underwires. Then I got pregnant and discovered the bliss of maternity bras. Post babies and breastfeeding I went back to the wires only to find they poked me and now I've got 'birdseyes' in my cleavage. I cannot fathom the underwire. Obviously the person who designed it has never had to wear one. Having big boobs we're all encouraged to wear them, but now I'm old and fat they're far too uncomfortable to contemplate. I'm happy with my 'wirefree' bras. I figured that if manufacturers could make a maternity bra without wires that fitted perfectly and provided excellent support to lactating breasts, they could do the same for large, non-lactating breasts too. I found the perfect fit for me at a large chain store and bought the same type for years. Not terribly sexy, but comfortable and serviceable. Now I've discovered same large chain has a moulded cotton bra in large sizes. Better still, you can order them online when the sales are on and collect them from the store. Bliss! - BeansGran
  • Well put Sonya. I am so glad that you have created this documentary. Also, you have put forward a voice of reason backed up by compelling evidence & your own credibility. I am pro-vaccination, but I understand why it is an delicate decision for many parents. I haven't come across the anti-vax theories (I'd never even heard of the AVN until Mamamia kept writing & tweeting about them). I'd always just followed the immunisation schedule. But I have come across a lot of pushy pro-vaxxers and I have to say, it is a turn off. I understand that it's a passionate issue. But is it an effective way of increasing immunisation rates? Of course not. Some pro-vaxxers make it their full time job to name, shame & harass people opposed to vaccination. Is harassment going to change their position, heck no! Is it going to galvanise their anti-vac position, quite probably! I just think we need to be smarter about this. I know it is not a "debate" in the sense that the science is in on the benefits & general safety of vaccines. But it completely normal to feel uneasy about purposely injecting your child with something most of us know very little about. And then watching their every breath that evening as they process that vaccine. Sonya, I hope that your documentary is the beginning of the change in the way we talk about immunisation. Well done. - Kasey
 
Categories:  Must see, News and Opinion

HEEEEEE’S BACK! OBAMA WINS!

It was a nailbiter there for a bit… but Barack Obama has been re-elected as US President for four more years!

What do you think about that?

It was an epic win, considering the parlous state of the U.S. economy, but Americans have placed faith in Obama to lead them out of the doldrums.

 

“Four more years.” Barack Obama tweeted this picture just after his victory was announced.
 

Our favourite results?

#1. This dropkick, Todd Akin (below), has been resoundly rejected by voters. He is now officially a rolled gold “loser”.

That’s something to celebrate. Hip, hip, HOORAY!

Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) successfully defended her seat against opponent Rep. Todd Akin (R), the Tea Party-backed Republican who became infamous for his comments about “legitimate rape.”

McCaskill supports abortion rights and is the first female senator from Missouri.

Akin was leading McCaskill in the polls until he said in August that victims of “legitimate rape” rarely get pregnant, because the female body “has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Akin was defending his position that abortion should be illegal, even in cases of rape.

In his concession speech Akin compared himself to people who have suffered from cancer, saying people like him, “suffer of cancer, loss of a job, house, loved ones and they press on.”

Even in defeat he managed to pile insult upon injury.

So long, buddy! Don’t let the door hit you on the arse on the way out!

#2. In Indiana, Democrat Joe Donnelly defeated Richard Mourdock (below) - the odious creep who said that pregnancies resulting from rape were “something God intended to happen”.

Mitt Romney immediately distanced himself from Mourdock’s comments, but didn’t withdraw his endorsement or ask for an ad he made for Mourdock to be pulled off air.

Hope Mourdock realises God wasn’t foolin’ when she intended to deny him office.

 

And we couldn’t resist this… a note to all the Republicans who threatened to move to Australia in the event of an Obama win. Thanks to Felicity Ryan…


If you missed Barack’s acceptance speech, here it is, in full.

YouTube Preview Image

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Obama Writes to a Bullied Child

Vote Early. Vote Weird.

Mitt Romney the Mad Man

Roseanne for Prez in 2012!

 

support us

24 Responses to this article

  1. Heather November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    A republican supporter tweeted not long ago to other republicans not to give up because God was on their side and would find a way of turning the results in their favour.
    Well sorry luv, your ‘god’ had more sense.

     
    • nellae November 7, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Heather, thank god I’m an atheist!!

       
  2. MoniqueN November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Todd Akin – exit pursued by a bear…

    Loving all the disgruntled Republicans tweeting about how they’re going to move to Australia. Yes do that, you’ll love it here, we have health care AND gun control laws!!

     
    • MazT November 8, 2012 Reply
       
       

      If they do, can we send them to Nauru?

       
  3. Gayle November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Right now is about the ONLY time you will ever want to visit the Australian Tea Party FB page – sad Mittney supporters talking about immigrating to Australia but being told it’s no use – Obama won and Gillard will too.

     
  4. Rhoda November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I only wonder Obama didn’t win in a landslide. Hopefully we can breathe easy for a few more years. These Republican leaders have been waving the medieval flag of Christendom. A very scary lot. I hope their religious fervour can be contained.

     
  5. Babs November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Obama won the unwinnable. I pray JG doesn’t follow suit down here in 2013.

     
    • lynda November 10, 2012 Reply
       
       

      she wont be around….behind bars!!!

       
  6. Carole/m November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    @gayle
    Took your advice and had a look at theAustralian Tea Party page OMG, everyone should have a look just once .
    Just so you know what a mob of deluded wankers they are.

     
  7. Loz November 7, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Maybe they mean Austria. At least I hope they do.

     
  8. Tony W November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    “Obama won the unwinnable. I pray JG doesn’t follow suit down here in 2013.”

    Yes Babs, Obama was re-elected after 4 years of 8-10% unemployment and the deficit at 72% of GDP. Gillard faces no such horrendous numbers – she’s a shoe in next year unless you can find another leader.

    If there’s a lesson in the US election, it’s that people aren’t easily bought with promises. Even in the worst of personal circumstances, they’d rather persevere than grasp at straws. That’s Abbott – a man of straw. An empty sloganeer. “Hope Reward and Opportunity” won’t cut it with Australians.

     
    • helenbea November 8, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Couldn’t have said it better Tony! The seemingly impossible becomes possible when people refuse to be hoodwinked by spin doctors.

      So relieved Obama has another 4 years to push through the barriers of conservative resistance. Sacred cows need challenging. It takes someone of good heart, courage and intelligence as well as the words to turn the tide of thinking about the American dream and how that is/isn’t manifesting.

      Leaders who work for equity, for humanity will go forward in present consciousness. The ‘masses’ aren’t storming the Bastille with a battering ram but with their voices and their votes. The ‘minority’ groups in USA said it all with their vote.

      Take note Australians who have been hammering Gillard. Open your eyes and minds to the reality of our situation.

      Yes, there are issues to be addressed, particularly the refugee situation, if this government is to make a difference and move this country forward. However, gender equity is just the tip of the iceberg. Get that rolling and other equity issues can be addressed too.

       
  9. Jane November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I am so happy Obama has four more years .. I love the US – with all its ‘warts and difficulties’. I have been there quite a few times in the past four years and find the people so generous of spirit – they want you to love their country as mush as they do. My daughter lives there now – she and all her young, wonderful friends are ‘over the moon’ Obama is back in — she probably would have come home if MR had been elected. I know the ‘fiscal cliff’ looms and what lies ahead is HUGE however Obama wants equity, a decent life, work, good education and peace for the American people. His intentions are honorable – I HOPE he and his colleagues can achieve their plans. If America doesn’t succeed it will not be great for all of us! Yes he can!

     
  10. Lindy November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    A great win for a great man who inspires all who aren’t looking through blinkered eyes.

     
  11. Jenny November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I’m so glad Obama won! I want to see him continue the great work he has been doing to bring about social reform in the US. Four years was never going to be long enough to achieve his objectives, and the Republicans looked as if they would pull apart everything good he has tried to do so far. This result gives me some hope that the Australian voters will be able to see the wood through the trees when our time comes.

     
  12. Lynne November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Had a look @ the Australian Tea Party (no historical sense!) At worst they predicted a pretty easy – landslide win for Mitt baby. Must be crying in their tea leaves this morning! Otherwise they seem to be rude and unintelligent, pretty much what you’d expect.

     
  13. JoanneH November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    More good news – A total of six male Republican candidates, who made sexist pro-life comments re. rape and abortion, were defeated yesterday. (as they like saying – God works in mysterious ways!).

    The GOP need to realize that women deserve to make their own reproduction health decisions. It is time now to clean the bigots and Tea-Party influence out, and broaden their appeal by listening to, and include all sections of the community.

     
  14. David November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    The Oz Tea Party are also quite tardy at web maintenance. That article on the certainty of a Mitt presidency looks pretty stupid today, doesn’t it? David Goodridge has demonstrated why he should avoid any work that either predicts American politics or, more generally, has any statistical content at all.

     
  15. ro.watson November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I am a sucker for uplifting rhetoric and aspirational fairgo vision~ so I am very glad Obama has won the presidency. I feel I need to know more about how their political system works…probably West Wing only partially educated us~ and I feel sorry for american people having to endure such a long lead up to voting…

     
  16. Maye November 8, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Good to hear President Obama saying he would look into the American voting system. It’s no wonder they are reluctant to “go and vote”. Hour long queues – horrendous. But why worry the results were marvellous. Four years now for Obama to continue the clean up of the mess he inherited.

     
  17. Tony W November 9, 2012 Reply
     
     

    “I am a sucker for uplifting rhetoric and aspirational fairgo vision~ so I am very glad Obama has won the presidency.”

    Yeah me too! And I’m sure that’s why he won in such dark times. He’s a marvellous orator, echoes of MLK sometimes, and like MLK he simply articulates a vision for the future and invites the nation to do the hard yards to get there. JFK did the same – “Ask not what your country can do for you….”

    It’s a very different proposition from offering idealogical “solutions” and making promises, eg. Romney “12 million new jobs”.

    I’m not surprised at the Tea Party reaction, it’s a devastating blow for them and their future in the GOP now looks bleak. They cost it government and that won’t be forgotten or forgiven. I expect they’ll be increasingly marginalized, particularly if the US economy picks up in the next 4 years. But for the GFC we never would have seen these extremists, they’re nothing but reactionaries, no real vision, just naked ideology.

    I’m sure we’ll see the same thing play out in Australia with the Liberal Party next year. Surely after this result they’ll realize they need a more moderate leader.

    Anyway I’m feeling quite proud of our American cousins at the moment – there’s much to be admired in the way they rejected extremism in such difficult times.

     
  18. Amanda November 9, 2012 Reply
     
     

    @TonyW
    Anyway I’m feeling quite proud of our American cousins at the moment – there’s much to be admired in the way they rejected extremism in such difficult times

    Absolutely!
    Here’s to the end of the Tea Party. It’s unbelievable how the rank and file of this movement voted against their own interest. As the Washington Crikey correspondent noted, this election was a triumph of rationality over irrationality and science over unreason. We can all breathe a sigh of relief.

     
  19. Annie Also November 10, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Such a relief.
    I hope it is the beginning of a new common sense in the world of politics.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

porno porno sex

Talking About Dementia

Your Score:  

Your Ranking:  

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Carolyn: I agree with at least one or two of the statements (and if you'd seen my cousins, you'd be hoping it wasn't that one). T...

  • Kel: You a past Labor member? That's a good one! So presumably you were once concerned about social justice. You railed again...

  • Kel: Well what's your take on why the ABC PLUS the MSM refuses to investigate the Ashby affair; you know where a federal just...

  • Nathan: There is an issue with semantics regarding this article and Summers' thesis in general, which is the distinction between...

Freebies

loading time: 0.97 sec