Categories:  Entertainment

HATE THE CHARACTER, LOVE THE BOOK?

When Lionel Shriver finished her now-legendary novel We Need to Talk about Kevin, her agent wrote to her: “For the life of me, I don’t know who is going to fall in love with this novel.”

The subject matter was too dark, the agent said, and the characters were unsympathetic. The book was rejected by around 30 publishers before it was finally accepted.

Well over a million sales later, on the release of the film version, Shriver wrote:  “Many objected that its narrator, Eva, is ‘unattractive’… Rife with difficult characters and climaxing in a high-school massacre of the sort Americans are rightly ashamed of, Kevin was a poor commercial bet from the get-go.”

This isn’t just a gratuitous dig at those who rejected her, however.

Shriver is pointing out a phenomenon that has troubled me for some time: the way some readers, and perhaps more depressingly, literary agents and publishers, need to find a character likable before they can love a book.

My new novel Animal People has been out for less than a week, but already in some responses I am detecting a whiff of this complaint, that my protagonist Stephen – an unambitious, slightly lost 39-year-old man making his way through a single hellish day in his very ordinary life – is not likeable enough.


BUY THE BOOK

This vibe, it has to be said, is coming mainly from a particular kind of woman – capable, smart, no-nonsense women with forceful personalities. And I can understand their frustrations, and even be amused by it.

One woman, at a pre-publication publishing do, took me aside and admonished me, sotto voce and with a kind of prim disappointment, that she had found Stephen “very frustrating” in my previous novel, The Children.

I had to snicker inwardly at this, because I was still very much carrying Stephen around in my head; it was all I could do not to say, “And I know exactly what he would think of you.” But she also sort of missed the point.

 Page 1 of 2 next >>

31 Responses to this article

  1. Wendy Harmer October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    In my first novel “Farewell My Ovaries” the herione, Claire was a flawed human. I recall one reader saying: “I suppose the writer will be pleased with herself that I followed to see what she would do till the very last page.” I was rather. When the book was sent to the US – every rejection slip mentioned that Claire had had too many sexual partners in her past to be “likeable” for women readers. I still think that’s strange because the book was all about our sexual histories and , in the end, about fidelity.

    Can’t wait to find time read your new book, Charlotte. I am such a fan of your work. Thank you for writing for us!

     
  2. Pip October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I think readers are very forgiving when it comes to unlikeable, even downright ugly, characters. Just look at the success of Christos Tsiolkas’s book (now TV show) The Slap or Jeff Lindsay’s Dexter series. Personally, I’m always looking for a truthful, intriguing character, I don’t have to like them, or agree with anything they say or do. Great article – can’t wait to read Animal People.

     
  3. charlottewood October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Thanks gals! I wonder if this likeable thing is more expected of women characters than male? Shriver is also pretty eloquent on the topic of girly book covers being given to her – decidedly UNgirly – books, to make them look sweeter and more approachable.

    I wonder if male writers have the same expectations about nice characters?

    I should add that the reviewers I mention have not universally disliked my (darling) Stephen – but even though the book has only been out for about three days, I am finding a tiny trend towards the most favourable comment is coming from male readers. Interesting!

     
  4. Wendy Harmer October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Funny you should say that!! Male writers loved the sexual freewheeling character of Claire ( I think they wished they’d bonked her) but women were much less forgiving. Rosemary Neill from the OZ newspaper told me to my face that I was “immoral”. Hah!

     
  5. Jennifer October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    For me it’s more about empathy & believability. I didn’t like The Slap because they were unpleasant, but because I thought some of them were not at all believable & I had little empathy for any of them. On the other hand, I’ve just finished Beyond Black by Hilary Mantel , which is full of some very unlikeable characters, but I adored it. I was engrossed in their story & I cared about what happened to them.

     
  6. Sally October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Totally with you, Charlotte. Since when did a character have to be likeable to be fascinating, engaging, thrilling, amusing? Very much looking forward to ‘Animal People’. Some of my best friends (imaginary or not) are fabulously, fatally flawed.

     
  7. MoniqueN October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I was going to reference ‘the Slap’ myself, as I found every single character in that book utterly loathsome and yet still couldn’t put it down.

    I think that the characters being loathesome worked in this case and as people have said many of the great characters in literature have been ‘difficult’ or ‘unlikeable’ (add Anna Karenina and Scarlett O’Hara to the list) and often that works. In my book devouring youth I was given a ‘Pollyanna’ book, read one chapter and chucked it under the bed never to see the light of day again.

    Give me flawed characters, at least they’re interesting

     
  8. Kylie Ladd October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    After my publicist finished reading my recent novel, Last Summer, she rang me to enthuse (as publicists are wont to) how much she’d LOVED it and all the characters. But then she dropped her voice. “Except Anita, I have to admit,” she went on. “She was too cold and uptight. I didn’t like her at all. Sorry.”

    Sorry? I WROTE Anita to be like that. For one, she changed over the course of the book and I wanted to look at how and why that happened, but more to the point I wanted her to be unlikeable because people are. We’re not all the same- thank God- and I’d hate to read (or write) a novel where every single character was eminently likeable. Not only would it be boring, it would be confusing!

     
    • charlottewood October 5, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Hi Kylie, thanks – yes it’s funny when people apologise for not liking a character. I feel like saying, ‘but what did you *think* about them?’

      I seem to be ending up posting these replies at weird places, sorry if it looks garbled!

       
      • Siobhan October 5, 2011 Reply
         
         

        Charlotte, thanks for a wonderfully illuminating article. You have articulated so well all the reasons why I love to read fiction — much better than I’ve been articulating to myself.

        For me Stephen IS someone I can sympathise with, but then I also liked Anita in ‘Last Summer’. I think the so-called ‘losers’ or ‘outsiders’ always spark empathy and understanding in me.

        It’s so easy to get caught in that trap of merely relating to characters or events without really analysing our thoughts about them. Truthfulness and believable characters are the key to my enjoyment of fiction.

         
    • Michelle October 6, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Aww. I loved Anita. It irritated me that the other characters from Last Summer didn’t get her the way I did.

      I’ve never really understood why people condemn a book on the basis of its characters. And isn’t it strange the way people will abandon a book on the basis of a character they don’t like….but you rarely hear this criticism applied to movies and television shows?

      Personally, I particularly love reading about flawed, confused, unreliable characters. They’re why I read!

       
  9. Kylie Ladd October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    PS. Great blog!! I agree with you entirely.

     
  10. Renee October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I love nothing more than getting emotionally involved with fictional characters! I so agree with the comments above about The Slap – I really didn’t like any of the characters, but I absolutely loved the novel. And I think what I didn’t really “like” about them was purely the fact that I saw elements of myself and my family and friends in them, they pointed a finger at me and said “YOU know what I mean…”. And there are so many more books with flawed characters that I would call favourites. These characters are interesting and trying to work them out keeps you involved and immersed as you read further into the plotline…

     
    • Alison October 5, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Couldn’t agree more with what has been said before – you have to believe in the characters. Especially love it when they genuinely make you laugh out loud or have a good cry!

       
  11. charlottewood October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Jennifer, you hit on something that the Twitter chat also brought up – that readers need to *believe* in the characters, good or bad, more than to like them.

    I loved The Slap for the way it sort of stuck a pitchfork into middle Australia – but I also loved Hilary Mantel’s Beyond Black, though I found it incredibly harrowing, did you? She is a BRILLIANT writer, isn’t she?

     
  12. charlottewood October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Ha! Monique – love the idea of Pollyanna getting the chuck!

     
  13. Judith Ridge October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I love your high school English teacher, Charlotte! I teach a five week course in writing children’s books, and the most common thing that comes up when I ask them to think about what makes a good children’s book, and what kids look for in a book, is this idea of “characters you can relate to”. It’s an idea that clearly has traction, but for me it’s a very limiting one–do we really only read to see people just like us? It’s a close first cousin to this idea of having to like characters, I think, and limiting for much the same reason. I like fiction that takes me out of my comfort zone–always did, even as a child–and if I like ideas and people that challenge me in real life, why wouldn’t I want them in the books I read?

     
    • charlottewood October 5, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Hi Judith, I had two brilliant English teachers for my whole high school education – and they really did teach me how to read I think. If you can cleanse your classes of the dreaded
      ‘relate’ question I think you are right, you will be also attacking the ‘likeability’ question.

      Do you reckon it has echoes in broader life, how we seem to be emoting more and more all the time, but not *thinking* so much or examining what our emotions mean, or challgenign them? I think these questions are on the same spectrum perhaps ….

       
  14. Diane Sanna October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    We Need to Talk About Kevin. I was loaned this book by my son several years ago. His then girl friend, a school teacher, said it was a book that every mother should read. I started to read it and felt like giving up after a few pages as it really didn’t seem like my kind of book. But I was not about to admit to my son’s girl friend that I had given up on it. I ploughed on through it to the bitter end. Wow what a powerful story. I am so glad that I gritted my teeth and kept going. I can’t wait to see the movie. Did anyone see Lionel Shriver on Q & A (ABC) several months ago. What an interesting lady.

     
  15. Jo October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Of course there’s no hard-and-fast rules – and especially not with this – but I read fiction primarily for the characters. Not to ‘like’ them, but to delve into their psychology – how they think, how they relate, how they react to life events and how they’re shaped by their experiences and each other. For those small insights, small moments of recognition or revelation.

    In terms of Stephen – and Eva in ‘Kevin’, and many of the characters in The Slap – I don’t think liking the characters matters for me so much as empathising with them. Which isn’t the same thing, and doesn’t mean overall empathy either. It can be catching yourself in a moment when you realise why a despicable character is the way they are, or where you find yourself rooting for them though you don’t like them. It can be understanding them, but still despising them at every moment. It’s about putting yourself in their place, which is at the core of empathy.

    This is very long comment, sorry … but one final thing: re Stephen, you don’t have to like everything about a character or a person to like them. We love most people despite their flaws, not because they have none. And Stephen’s real flaws are outbalanced by his heart and genuine warmth, which I think is most important.

     
  16. Robyne Young October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    All of this echoes the conversation last week, so I’m going to save some energy and paraphrase what I wrote after I had just finished Chris Womersley’s ‘The Low Road’ – Perhaps what keeps us reading is that there is an aspect of ourselves that is reflected and we can examine that at a safe distance. And who knows, given a certain set of circumstances none if us knows how we might respond.
    It’s ultimately the writing and storytelling that keeps me reading.
    The woman who made the comment to you about your character sounds like the person who, at an event my friend organised, congratulated her on the calibre of the speaker, but wanted to talk to her about the cutlery! Give me strength!

     
  17. Eileen Dreyer October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    When Elizabeth George wrote her first mystery, A Great Deliverance, she had a 2 person police team. Inspector Linley and Sgt. Barbara Havers. Linley was aristocratic, intelligent, complex. Havers was the most disagreeable character I’ve ever read. I spent much of the book thinking, “Okay, the author is going to change her, clean her up, soften her up.” She didn’t. She was disagreeable beginning to end. But which character was more memorable? Havers. By the end of the book, I was desperate to know that she would come out whole, both physically and psychologically.

    I think non-likable characters tend to make the most impact, because we need to understand, not just why they’re the way they are, but why they compel us.

     
    • jenran October 5, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Eileen, I am with you on that! I have read every book so far published in the Linley-Havers series by Elizabeth George, and it is Barbara Havers who is for me the main character draw-card. Her development over time, and her ongoing relationships with Linley, her aging parents, and her Indian neighbours (father and daughter) are the reason I am always waiting with baited breath for the next book to arrive in the bookshops. She has become a real person to me with all her flaws and human ordinariness, not to mention her total lack of charm, social grace or fashion sense, and her tasteless personal habits. I have grown to love her as one would a clumsy, accident-prone but loyal friend.

       
      • mick davidson April 11, 2012 Reply
         
         

        @Eileen and Jan
        The BBC mad these stories into an excellent series. Havers is a much more likeable and sympathetic figure in comparison to your descriptions of her. Linley is much less agreeable, and seems to go out of his way to be annoying. Of the two characters, Barbara is the one I prefer and is, despite her peculiar personal situation, the stronger of the two. The frustration she feels at being held back in her job, is very obvious at times. I’ve not read any of the books, so it would be interesting to hear a comparison between them and the BBC series.

         
  18. Pam Newton October 5, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Great blog Charlotte and lively responses.

    I wonder if people sometimes say “like” when they really mean something more along the lines of care, believe, concerned, interested?

    It’s the characters who bother me, who are still in my head and my heart in some way when I am not reading the book that work. They’ve become so alive that I wonder and worry about them, about the bits of their lives that are going on beyond the bit I’ve been shown in the book.

    Yes, I do think there’s a greater expectation on women writers to create “role model” female characters. The negative reaction to Wendy’s character for having a sexual history is just …….. words fail me. Perhaps if she’d been a spy named “Jane Bond” her sex life would have been acceptable.

     
    • Donna Kilby October 6, 2011 Reply
       
       

      Yes, I’m not sure it’s likeability, it’s more relatability, or caring about what’s going to happen to the characters. Terrible example, because I hated the book, but Catcher in the Rye, people like an unreliable narrator.

      Can’t wait to get my hands on Animal People, Charlotte. Have heard great things.

       
    • charlottewood October 6, 2011 Reply
       
       

      I agree Pam that maybe ‘like’ is just a sort of shorthand for other issues- and I think as many have commented here, the ability to *believe* in the characters is most important. And maybe complexity is the issue more than anything – interestingly with Stephen’s girlfriend Fiona, I had to write her quite a few times before I could bring her to life – and found that for me the key to making her live was giving her a few moments of being immature, or a bit mean. It was, as Jo suggests above, actually her flaws that made Fiona start walking and talking in the book (to me, anyway).

       
  19. Prawnfraser October 6, 2011 Reply
     
     

    This is a great question; “The Slap” ignited great debate in our book club. I argued that although most of the characters were loathsome, they were very well observed and the book was compelling and well written. Others hated the book because they didn’t like the characters. Imagine if books were only written about “nice” people?

     
  20. Liz (@liza_belle) October 6, 2011 Reply
     
     

    One of my favourite recent reads, Ann-Marie MacDonald’s Fall On Your Knees, is full of frustrating, unpleasant and in some ways horrific main characters. I really admired MacDonald’s ability to take me inside those characters and identify with them, even sympathise with them, without shying away from their nastier aspects.

    I definitely don’t think “nice” characters is a prerequisite, but equally, I think writing them in such a way that forces the reader to identify with them is important.

    Charlotte, my copy of Animal People arrived today, so I look forward to getting stuck in!

     
  21. Stephanie Clifford-Smith October 7, 2011 Reply
     
     

    I certainly don’t need to like a character to like the book. In fact all my favourite books have either unlikeable or difficult characters who are also intriguing or believable or hilarious in some way. I’m thinking of John Lanchester’s Mr Phillips and that same author’s hilarious Tarquin Winot in The Debt to Pleasure. Then there’s the nutter in James Hamilton-Paterson’s Cooking with Fernet Branca. Also loved The Slap and We need to talk about Kevin, probably because of their flawed but fascinating characters. Charlotte I love Stephen, by the way, and am loving Animal People.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Maureen B: My grandsons school in England has banned all nut products throughout the whole school including juniors, since he start...

  • and: My son is now 11 and still anaphylactic to egg (my 4 year old also allergic but not as severe). There is a no sharing po...

  • Dog lover landlord: We moved to Singapore from Sydney two years ago and took our two cattle dogs with us. Here more than 95% of the populat...

  • egipt wczasy: This is the correct blog for anybody who desires to search out out about this topic. You understand a lot its almost ard...

  • Nikki @ Styling You: Yes they are! Winter and summer.

Pin It

Follow Us on Pinterest

The Hoopla now has a page on Pinterest, the virtual pinboard that helps you organise and share beautiful things found on the web. Follow us to see our great pictures.

Follow Us on Pinterest

Freebies

WOMAN OF THE WEEK

 Vivacious politician and tireless brain cancer campaigner. This week, for Brain Cancer Action Week, we pay tribute to Keri Huxley. Read more >