Categories:  Harmer's Hoopla, News and Opinion, Stockland Shopwise

COAL SEAM GAS & THE BATTLE FOR THE REEF

In the most recent development, The ABC’s Four Corners featured a story about the four giant shipping terminals planned along the north Australian coast near the Great Barrier Reef.

The terminals for the export of coal seam gas require a massive dredging project which is threatening the habitat of fish an dugongs and the reef itself.

As The Age newspaper reported: ”The Gladstone Ports Corporation (GPC) has approvals to dredge 46 million cubic metres from within the harbour boundaries, inside the World Heritage area, over the next 20 years.. a volume equivalent to 27 Melbourne Cricket Grounds.”

The activist group Get Up! says:

It’s the largest dredging project ever undertaken in Australia, and one that has the United Nations’ Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) so alarmed they’re warning the Reef could lose its iconic world heritage status. We’ve created an emergency petition to stop this. Sign here, tune in and spread the word now.

As The Hoopla previously reported:

“The controversy over the safety of “fracking” in Australia continues after revelations that the practice was the likely cause of 50 tremors in the UK earlier this year.

The Sydney Morning Herald says:

“A panel of seismic experts has found it ‘highly probable’ that fracking conducted by Cuadrilla Resources – 41 per cent of which is owned by the Australian drilling company AJ Lucas – was the cause of two significant tremors and 48 aftershocks near Blackpool in England in April and May.

“The findings come after the independent MP Tony Windsor told the federal government this week he would not support its mining tax unless more was done to investigate the safety of fracking in Australia.

“Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a controversial gas extraction technique that uses high pressure solutions to fracture rocks deep underground. The process is used in both coal seam gas and shale gas extraction and, if poorly executed, can contaminate groundwater and trigger seismic activity.”

I wrote on the battle between the mining companies and farmers on October 17:


Have you seen the TV advertisement that says Coal Seam Gas mining is good for Australia? (How could you have missed it?)

It’s the one titled, “We Want CSG” where various weathered country types stare down the barrel and tell you earnestly that the industry is clean, green and will have minimal impact on our farming land.

Before you believe everything you see (although, since when did you ever do that), you should know that it’s only one side of the story.

Only one aspect of the David and Goliath battle that I believe every Australian should take a long, hard look at.

On one side of the gate are the mining titans: AGL, Santos, Arrow Energy and Origin Energy and major foreign investors such as ConocoPhillips. On the other, the Lock the Gate Alliance representing Australian farmers.

This past weekend thousands of protesters staged rallies across the country condemning Australia’s multi-billion dollar coal seam gas (CSG) industry.

Australian farmers gathered in NSW, Queensland and Western Australia in the biggest series of demonstrations against the controversial extraction technique which uses chemicals pumped into the ground to release gas (for an explanation of the technique, see the second video below.)

The Lock the Gate Alliance has asked the Advertising Standards Bureau, the body that judges consumer complaints against Australian advertisements, to discontinue or order the modification of the television advertisements authorised by the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association.

As reported in New Matilda, Drew Hutton, president of Lock The Gate Alliance said: “This multi-million dollar advertising campaign is a slap in the face to rural communities who are living in fear of the impacts on their farms, their health and their water resources… we are not prepared to tolerate it.

“The TV advertisements are based on a whole lot of misleading concepts such as: CSG has a minimal impact on farm land, can be conducted harmoniously with agriculture and is a clean green energy source.”

“In the interest of balance, I have to bring you the advertisement from the Lock the Gate Alliance.

YouTube Preview Image

“When I first saw it I wrote:

This is horrifying. I cannot imagine the heartache for farmers when they see their beloved properties scarified by a patchwork of wells and pipelines. Are animal wildlife corridors taken into account when pipes are laid and habitat hacked into jigsaw pieces?

And what of Landcare projects and organic ratings? Not to mention the health and welfare of farmers and their families. They must be living a waking nightmare.

All Australians must be alarmed and aware of the issues in coal seam gas extraction. Our future is at stake!

“And to leave you with a jaunty, informative but no less disturbing take:

YouTube Preview Image

10 Responses to this article

  1. Lesley Palma October 17, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Yes, what the frXck is going on? Anna Bligh’s on a role, that’s what’s going on. Forget tourism, everything here in Queensland is about mining. Until it can be proven irrefutably that there is absolutely NO impact on community health, water, land, animals or the air we breath, farmers and landowners need to shut the gates against mining. What’s the point of having a “clean, green energy source” if the end result of getting it out there is causing such havoc along the way. The one thing I am unsure of is what position is the farmer in if he/she has signed a contract and accepted payment from a mining company, giving them the right to mine on that farmer’s property. I suspect there are complications in that area. I know it is creating jobs, which is a positive aspect, and a friend of mine does work at a mine, but does job creation outweigh health? No, it does not.

     
  2. TrevorCrouch October 18, 2011 Reply
     
     

    This impending disaster can be stopped by electing at least 46 new electorate based, not party endorsed, candidates in the Qld elections. Bring back Democracy

     
  3. Val Lewis October 18, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Vote more Greens in at every level. They are not anti-capitalism, just pro-environment.

     
  4. Goldgirl October 20, 2011 Reply
     
     

    The mining ads in general are offensive.
    Here’s another Qld mining story – today on ABC.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-20/am-clive-palmer-mine/3580458

    Sad but true.

     
  5. Lesley Palma October 21, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Alan Jones made an impressive address to the National Press Club in Canberra the other day. The information that he provided was nothing short of astounding. I sat with my mouth wide open and at times my hands clapped to the side of my head in absolute disbelief. He is not one to mince words and the facts that he presented even had some worried looks on some journos faces.

     
    • Goldgirl October 21, 2011 Reply
       
       

      ’bout time he used his evil for some good..’

       
  6. jenny c October 21, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Hey Wendy – so fantastic that you are bringing this issue to others – I remember making a feeble attempt to invite yourself and Ange C to blockade parliament house with 150 other ordinary Australians to ask K.Rudd, before Copenhagen, to do what he promised and act on climate!! These companies are in a Coal Rush (that includes gas) and a frenzy is underway to get as much out for as much short term profit as possible. As a mum of 3 young kids I have done everything in my power in recent years to stop this from happening – the more people understand the power and influence of the mining companies, the greater chance we have of raising our advocacy and holding our decision makers to account. Please keep doing all you can to help transition this country to 100% renewables and halt the export coal industry.

     
  7. Narelle November 6, 2011 Reply
     
     

    why are we letting these mining people ruin this land? Are we really all so blinded by making money that we don’t worry about the consequences?

     
  8. Sharlene November 7, 2011 Reply
     
     

    All the concern about greenhouse effects will be irrelevant unless fracking ceases. Once the artesian well is contaminated there will be no water to use for watering food sources (meat/fruits/veggies) or drinking not to mention the earthquakes. If fracking doesn’t destroy the earth, the residue from the whole procedure with the salts destroying the ground will. Overall greenhouse effects will be a minor concern if CSG mining continues on.

     
  9. gardnerm November 8, 2011 Reply
     
     

    Carbon tax, fracking!!!!! Go figure.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

Left Right

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Maureen B: My grandsons school in England has banned all nut products throughout the whole school including juniors, since he start...

  • and: My son is now 11 and still anaphylactic to egg (my 4 year old also allergic but not as severe). There is a no sharing po...

  • Dog lover landlord: We moved to Singapore from Sydney two years ago and took our two cattle dogs with us. Here more than 95% of the populat...

  • egipt wczasy: This is the correct blog for anybody who desires to search out out about this topic. You understand a lot its almost ard...

  • Nikki @ Styling You: Yes they are! Winter and summer.

Pin It

Follow Us on Pinterest

The Hoopla now has a page on Pinterest, the virtual pinboard that helps you organise and share beautiful things found on the web. Follow us to see our great pictures.

Follow Us on Pinterest

Freebies

WOMAN OF THE WEEK

 Vivacious politician and tireless brain cancer campaigner. This week, for Brain Cancer Action Week, we pay tribute to Keri Huxley. Read more >