• @ Bridgeymah: "denigration of PM Gillard with her comment that “Ms Gillard wore unflattering jackets and had a “big arse”. Greer was NOT denigrating Gillard, she was exhorting her to ignore her male minders who were deciding her wardrobe. And rightly so - they were dressing her up in ridiculous Barbie doll jackets all pinched in at the waist, presumably to give the impression of an hourglass figure they felt would be more appealing to men. Greer was telling her accept her own body shape and stop allowing men to distort it and fashion it according to their own idealized tastes. She may have expressed herself clumsily but she was extremely frustrated, she was imploring Gillard - "Julia! Women are fat-arsed creatures! You've got a fat arse, get over it, stop wearing those ridiculous jackets." And guess what? She stopped wearing them! As usual the media chose to misrepresent what Greer said by sensationalizing the "fat arse" part and turning it into an insult. IT WASN'T!! It was ADVICE!! Just like saying to a male PM wearing a hairpiece to appeal to women - "Men go bald! You're bald, get over it, stop wearing that ridiculous hairpiece." - Tony W
  • @ MicheleS: "Serena Williams stated she did not blame the girl" And yet that's exactly what she did. Refer Oxford: blame: assign the responsibility for a bad or unfortunate situation or phenomenon to (someone or something) - Tony W
  • I seen a lot of this: anyone to read ur essay is already a convert. We all worried about this foreboding change, and I imagine no backward step at the time of election. Conservatives are so desperate to control govt they sure to fail. Look at Corey Bernardo's Facebook and grasp the horror. It will be ok. Fanks. - Andy Harris
  • It has got nothing to do with being a woman, Thatcher, Merkel, Helen Clark were all successful female leaders who commanded respect and won majorities in elections, so far Gillard has achieved neither and looks likely to suffer the fate of former Canadian PM Kim Campbell in the election by taking her party to virtual obliteration. I am afraid the choice is not now between Gillard and Abbott, that is clearly now no electoral contest, but between Rudd and Abbott, only Rudd can stop an Abbott government and by this time next week he will probably have the chance to resume the premiership he won in a landslde and lost because of ALP in-fighting, not the Australian people! - HYUFD
  • And if the male minders would let go of there grip of Julia like in her "mysogyny parliament speech, and not like her 'women for Julia' launch speech she will shine through even more. Julia is brilliant always when they do not speech write for her. I have a feeling Germaine you know exactly what Julia is going through with the constant media attacks . You are an amazing women who comes through as always comes through for the sisterhood. Cheers. - Emily C
  • There is a distinction between saying “it is inadvisable to do X (because it may lead to or increase the risk of Y)” and saying “you are not entitled to do X, and if Y happens to you then you’ve got what you deserve.” Reasonable people have no problem with the first type of statement: it’s not victim blaming and you have to be deliberately obtuse or stupid to claim otherwise. To assert that a person has, ex ante, alternative courses of action open to them that can reduce or increase their chance of being attacked isn’t to reduce the culpability of the perpetrator for attacking them, and it doesn’t thereby imply that the victim is themselves liable for being attacked. Besides showing intellectual dishonesty and/or infirmity, the “don’t blame the victim” campaigners show an unpleasant willingness to use the tragic misfortune of other people as an opportunity to push political barrows and grind axes. - MicheleS
  • Tracey: “So it’s her fault because she was drunk.” That’s your interpretation. Two footballers had evil intentions and a 16 year old girl was drunk. Serena Williams stated she did not blame the girl and most of her comment was concern about how it had happened, quote “your parents should teach you…”. Her parents probably did teach her but like many teenagers she ignored their wise advice and took a risk. What a marvellous reminder to young people that bad things can happen. - MicheleS
  • Oh please - seems Ms Greer is feeling remorseful after the qanda comments. I'll be voting for that other party with a female leader. - ps
  • I think many women's rape stories get twisted by others no matter what they do. Not being believed would be the worst. - katie
  • Why can't we clone the wonderful Mr Windsor. What a sane and reasonable man, who looks to the future of our country to make decisions. His comments about Julia Gillard and the benefits of minority government are very interesting, and quite a breath of fresh air considering the level of commentary in the MSM. He really puts to shame the ALP/LNP duopoly. I can't believe that the people of New England could/would vote him out for Barnaby Joyce. Barnaby Joyce!!! - Juliebo
 
Categories:  News and Opinion

CHRISTINE ASSANGE. MOTHER’S COURAGE

*Wikileaks founder Julian Assange yesterday lost his appeal in London’s Supreme Court to avoid extradition to Sweden to face questioning over sexual assault accusations.

Mr Assange has been granted 14 days by the court to put in an application to reopen the case, after his lawyer, Dinah Rose QC, suggested the decision appeared to be based on a legal point that was not raised during the hearing.

Today Wikileaks supporters worldwide will rally to protest the court’s ruling which they fear will also lead to his extradition and imprisonment in the US.

By his side in London is Christine Assange, a mother fiercely dedicated to fighting for her son’s freedom.

Megan Kinninment interviewed Christine Assange in the lead-up to the court’s decision and found a woman under extraordinary pressure.

 

Julian Assange via Gawker.com.

All mothers worry about their kids. It goes with the territory.

Are they eating enough? Are they doing well at school? Will they be sent to America and be imprisoned and tortured? Oh, wait.

That last fear doesn’t crop up for most mothers, does it? For the mother of Wikileaks editor-in-chief, Julian Assange however, the fear is real.

As a journalist, I am fascinated by Wikileaks and its enigmatic Australian founder but as a mother I wonder how I would cope if it were my child under the spotlight of both the world’s media and the Pentagon. Last week I interviewed Christine Assange, 61, the mother of the man whose name returns over 28million results in a Google search.

I discovered a woman under extraordinary pressure.

In the coming days Julian Assange will hear the outcome of a UK Supreme Court appeal against extradition to Sweden to face questioning over sexual assault allegations made in 2010.

Christine Assange fears that once her son lands in Swedish soil he will be extradited to the US to be imprisoned for his role in publishing leaked secret diplomatic cables exposing the US government’s actions in the Iraq war.

Within seconds of ringing Christine Assange I sense I have entered a conflict zone and I am being briefed on the rules of engagement: There will be no face-to-face interview; any photo of her must be the side-on profile avatar she uses on Twitter (she wants to remain incognito in her new location); she will record our interview and insists I re-read her quotes to her before publication and stresses she wants “facts” in the story.

“I’m not doing this for myself, I am doing it for Jules,” she tells me.

And so begins the interview with a woman who is convinced not only is there a world-wide conspiracy against her son, but that his survival is intrinsically tied to the future of the free press and to democracy itself.

The stakes are high for Christine Assange.

She thinks her phones are being tapped; says she is trolled on Twitter and stalked in real life. She is having counselling.

She believes the Swedish allegations are revenge for the leaking of US diplomatic cables by Wikileaks in the same year, that her son has been framed.

She reveals to me where she is now living, only to retract the quote the next day, amending it to: “living in a secret location in Queensland, under a secret identity.”

 

 Page 1 of 2 next >>
support us

27 Responses to this article

  1. ANNE-MARIE ROCHET March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    dear mrs Assange, iam with you all my heart and i understand this intolerable situation. Your son is a winner,and iam sure he wins this game of life. take care,make yoga,and think for the best,and it will be.

     
  2. LB March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    its not that Christine “thinks” her phones are being tapped and she is being stalked…its not 1965 anymore….and having major political talking heads barking for Julian’s assassination…

    realize what is
    not what you perceive through your own lumpen bourgeoisie sensibilities which are a reflection of controlled media

    mmmk?

     
    • Wendy Harmer March 12, 2012 Reply
       
       

      That’s way harsh, LB. Megan went to a great deal of trouble to speak with Christine… unlike many. And she is reporting what Christine says , if Megan had doubted her she would have put it in inverted commas as you have done. I think this is a great piece of work bringing Christine’s desperate plight to light.

       
      • L. Martin June 30, 2012 Reply
         
         

        I absolutely agree with Wendy’s comment. This is a story about a woman operating from the most visceral of positions, seeing her son threatened to the point of losing his freedom or at worst his life, and wanting to protect him from the whole hideous situation. Perhaps LB, you’ve never been there!

         
  3. Vanessa March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I absolutely agree Wendy, and thanks for publishing it. A great piece. This is not about Assange really. It’s about what you’d do if your child was caught in a situation like this. I sat next to David Hicks’ Dad on a plane once (when David was still in Guantanamo) and he was like any other parent – worried out of his mind. If my child was in this situation I would do anything I could to rescue him.

     
  4. Hildegardy March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    This is a wonderful piece of enlightening journalism; news that offers us something beyond the agendas of the mainstream media.
    My heart goes out to Christine Assange. I have no difficulty at all in believing that she is being stalked, tapped, trolled and generally persecuted. I hope for all our sakes that her courage will be rewarded by seeing her son go free and unhampered in his great project: to keep the public informed of things that the powerful would rather we didn’t know.

     
  5. mama mogantosh March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    A terrifying situation for any mother. Her sense of hopelessness must be great. I’d love to read more. Thanks to Megan for bringing us a fresh perspective on this story.

     
  6. VanessaJ March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Sounds like this woman has had careful briefing from her son on how to permit an interview – sounds so familiar. Side profile indeed LOL.

     
  7. VanessaJ March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Re: “says she is trolled on Twitter ” – Christine Assange follows no one on twitter, so I suggest she goes looking for something to object to. Oh, and if you ask a civilised question on twitter, this is not actually trolling. What an obnoxious word anyway. The easiest thing Christine, would be to stop logging into twitter – this way you won’t see the nasties that upset you so much.

     
    • Wendy Harmer March 12, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Now I know why Christine Assange is worried. She’s not paranoid. Someone like you on my case would freak me out.
      Have a care.

       
  8. VanessaJ March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Really? On your case? I’m not sure what that actually means. I thought I was simply making a comment – just because I don’t agree entirely with what has been said here, does not make me ‘on your case’. As to ‘have a care’ – is that a warning?

     
    • Wendy Harmer March 12, 2012 Reply
       
       

      “Have a care” is something my grandmother used to say to me. It means have a care for the effect of your comments. You know you adopted a sarcastic and mocking tone. You did it deliberately. I am calling you on it. As I say, have a care for other’s suffering.

       
  9. Kaz March 12, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I think regardless of the pros, cons, whether you support or not what Assange is alleged to have done with Wikileaks, this is about the lengths a mother will go to to support her son, and her perceptions of the lengths others will go to to harm her son. There’s no doubt that in a US jail, something horrific would happen to Assange, as it did the inmates of Guantanamo. In her shoes I have no doubt I’d be a similar crusader for my sons rights, his life, his freedom. And I’d be living sick with fear. As with Terry Hicks, this woman is nothing more than a mother who believes innately in her child and for that she should be applauded.

     
  10. Yasmine Bonner March 13, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Christine you need to take stock of what Julian has done. I believe he deserves strength not weak kneed people surrounding him. There are a whole host of things in life that get thrown at us, and it takes an inner strength to get about you’re business without stomach ulcers. chin up, because thats what he needs, not helf issues.

     
  11. liza March 15, 2012 Reply
     
     

    We must be fair .Vanessa may not have any kids and therefore may be unable to empathise with Christine Assange.

    “Have a care” I understood as “Show compassion” Vanessa

    My heart goes out to this mother and also to Julian Assange as he has some extraordinarily powerful forces directed against him.

     
  12. Sally March 25, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Great piece Megan.
    The anxiety she must feel. Truly awful for any mother.

     
  13. annie May 31, 2012 Reply
     
     

    mothers anxiety is one thing, the world anxiety is another. I have known people to be persecuted for the one world order. if people are so taken up with watching soap opera television reading fairfax faxless news and believing its ok for a few to own and control the rest of the world ,then its all over.Why do you think people in the horn of Africa are starving, but I guess if your busy watching masterchef you wouldn’t know that.

     
  14. Cate May 31, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Thank you for writing this, Megan. My heart goes out to Ms. Assange. What a dreadful time for her. I hope she is able to stay strong for Julian and herself.

     
  15. Kerrie May 31, 2012 Reply
     
     

    If Julian Assange appeals again and loses again, it’s unlikely his feet will ever touch Swedish soil. He will be bundled straight on to a flight from Arlanda to the US, to stand trial on as-yet-unspecified charges. If our gutless government does its usual forelock-tugging routine, he risks being locked up indefinitely in some hellhole like GTMO. Meanwhile, spare a thought for Private Bradley Manning, who is being tried in secret and if convicted of the charge of giving aid to the enemy, could face life imprisonment. He also faces other charges, which carry a maximum combined penalty of 150 years. Christine Assange has every right to be terrified.

     
  16. The Huntress May 31, 2012 Reply
     
     

    I’m sure I’ve read this interview before, however, I believe it’s of the utmost importance to keep Julian Assanges case in the spotlight. I have been actively supporting this case for over 18 months now and continue to raise the issues. We cannot forget the peril this man is in and his fight for transparency in democracy. At the very least we should be supporting him as an Australian, as one of us.

    Gillard: Do not let Assange become your David Hicks. Fight to bring him home.

     
    • L. Martin June 30, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Yes, Yes, Yes

       
  17. Terri May 31, 2012 Reply
     
     

    Why is this allowed to happen? Why is our govt not protecting our citizens? We see our politicians running in parliament (to escape a vote), why aren’t they running to defend an Australian? Anyone with half a brain can see what is going on, the the way the USA is blatantly perusing this is indicative of their disregard of Australia’s citizens rights. I am an Australian mother.. I expect more from my government. I am so sorry for his mum and so sorry for our country if this pans out like predicted.

     
  18. Peter June 6, 2012 Reply
     
     

    It seems to me that Julian Assange is an intelligent and thoughtful man.

    Before he leaked the emails, he knew exactly what was in them, and the angst and embarrasment that they would cause to western governments.

    He also knew that if he treads on the toes of the big guys, then the big guys will tread back. And they have big feet, unlimited resources, and they can continue their revenge for a very long time. So he already knew what would be coming.

    Goverments will chase him relentlessly until he dies of stress, or exhaustion, or both. And they have to do this to dissuade others from copycat actions.

    So, knowing this already, in advance, why did he go ahead and do it anyway? Knowing that the fallout would directly impact his mother, family and friends.

    Or maybe he just didn’t think of this, didn’t think of his mother, and others, didn’t care.

     
    • Skitzi June 20, 2012 Reply
       
       

      Peter: Yeah, he may have known what sort of backlash he would be getting if he did what he did. However, if nobody took the chance like he did, crooked governments all over the world would find it much easier to get away with the corruption they are now. We need more like him to expose the rot that goes on behind closed doors in government. We should all be proud of his efforts and stand behind him as should our gutless, corrupt government.

       
  19. Random June 25, 2012 Reply
     
     

    ‘Paranoid though she may sound’,seems to me a strange way to start that sentence, Megan, as you go on to say that she has good reason for her beliefs, and from the comments above many seem to agree with her. Do I believe the US gov wants to indict him for treason? Absolutely. I also believe the Aus government will not place his safety above its relationship with the US. To me, Christine is a hero mother. I hope I’d have her strength should my children face legal or political adversity.

     

Have Your Say

Get e-mail notifications for new comments

 

You may also like

porno porno sex

Hoopla Poll

Comments

  • Tony W: @ Bridgeymah: "denigration of PM Gillard with her comment that “Ms Gillard wore unflattering jackets and had a “big...

  • Tony W: @ MicheleS: "Serena Williams stated she did not blame the girl" And yet that's exactly what she did. Refer Oxford: ...

  • Andy Harris: I seen a lot of this: anyone to read ur essay is already a convert. We all worried about this foreboding change, and I ...

  • HYUFD: It has got nothing to do with being a woman, Thatcher, Merkel, Helen Clark were all successful female leaders who comman...

Freebies

loading time: 1.31 sec